1990
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199010040-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Torsion Meter: A Critical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error values obtained with the manual method confirm published data showing mean values between 5°and 6° [15][16][17]. However, better accuracy (smaller RMS error) and precision (smaller SD) were provided by the digital method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The error values obtained with the manual method confirm published data showing mean values between 5°and 6° [15][16][17]. However, better accuracy (smaller RMS error) and precision (smaller SD) were provided by the digital method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The more commonly referred to Nash and Moe 9 technique of assessing rotation in grades would not reveal the more subtle rotational variations. Barsanti et al, 10 Weiss, 11 and Omeroglu et al 12 each reviewed the interobserver and intraobserver variability of the Perdriolle measurement technique and found it accurate within 5°in Ͼ90% of measurements. Richards 13 found the technique to be only accurate within 10°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Barsanti et al found that the Perdriolle torsion meter may be an effective method of measuring vertebral rotation. 41 In their study, 9 thoracic vertebrae from 3 disarticulated spines were individually rotated from 0°to 60°and measured with a torsion meter by 3 investigators. Errors were made in 41% of the measurements, of which 92% were within Ϯ5°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%