“…Regarding the discussion, we can generate the policy implications for the protected area managers of the coral reef: (1) the management program have to contain living coral coverage, biodiversity, marine protected area, water quality levels, number of visitors, and a coral reefs conservation fund for the reef protected area [6,7,9,25,27,33]; (2) it would meet the goals of sustainable development to contain the aspects of ecology, recreation, and institution into protected area management [8,44]; (3) capturing the heterogeneity's preference for the stakeholders would help to integrate the comprehensive framework of market segmentation strategy by combining the qualitative and quantitative data in a protected area [44][45][46][47]; (4) for the environmental education and positioning of a reef protected area, programmers may concentrate on increasing the 50%-75% of living coral coverage, increasing the biodiversity, increasing the marine protected area at 6%, improving the seawater quality to an unpolluted level, and restricting the daily number of visitors to 75% of the status quo. Thus, this would meet the criterion of sustainable marine tourism of reef protected area simultaneously with a visitor's preferences and opinions for the effectiveness program in the future.…”