2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-012-9190-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The track of policies for educational equality and its implications in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social inequalities derive from the facts that rich households can afford more and better quality shadow education than can poor households, and that these investments translate into educational achievements and subsequent lifelong earnings (see e.g. Bray 1999;Jo 2013;Jokić 2013). Another challenge, prominent among discussions in Shanghai, concerns the burden on students who have heavy schedules of supplementary lessons on top of their standard school days.…”
Section: Global Patterns and Implications Of Shadow Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social inequalities derive from the facts that rich households can afford more and better quality shadow education than can poor households, and that these investments translate into educational achievements and subsequent lifelong earnings (see e.g. Bray 1999;Jo 2013;Jokić 2013). Another challenge, prominent among discussions in Shanghai, concerns the burden on students who have heavy schedules of supplementary lessons on top of their standard school days.…”
Section: Global Patterns and Implications Of Shadow Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From educational dimension, the Kim government tried to link education policy to "marketism" based on "productivity". The benchmark of the political shift was when the nation's Constitutional Court declared in 1990 that the restrictions on private lessons were unlawful as they violated the personal freedom and right to education (Jo, 2013). This declaration demonstrated a political and social shift in the perception of shadow education from being viewed as a social ill to a legitimate social norm.…”
Section: Comparing States Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%