2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2009.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trade depressing and trade diversion effects of antidumping actions: The case of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the most recent period common to all importers guarantees that we are excluding the first few years after the introduction of an AD law when the AD system is not yet well established. 21 Denoting this variable   , our theoretical model suggests that the AD measures introduced by other countries affect an importing country's decision to introduce an AD measure only for intermediate values of   . To allow for such a nonlinear effect, we introduce both   and its squared term.…”
Section: Econometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of the most recent period common to all importers guarantees that we are excluding the first few years after the introduction of an AD law when the AD system is not yet well established. 21 Denoting this variable   , our theoretical model suggests that the AD measures introduced by other countries affect an importing country's decision to introduce an AD measure only for intermediate values of   . To allow for such a nonlinear effect, we introduce both   and its squared term.…”
Section: Econometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prusa (1997) finds substantial tradediversion effects for US AD measures, while Konings et al (2001) find no such effect for a sample of EU AD cases. 3 Similarly, Ganguli (2008) and Park (2009) document significant 2 There is also a (short) literature on how individual firms react to the introduction of AD measures (see footnote 8 for some references). 3 However, Brenton (2001) does find evidence of trade-diversion effects in the case of EU AD measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD measures, whereas Konings, Vandenbussche, and Springael (2001) find limited trade-diversion effects for a sample of EU AD cases (but Brenton 2001 does find evidence of significant trade-diversion effects in the case of EU AD measures). Similarly, Ganguli (2008) and Park (2009) document substantial AD trade-diversion effects for India and China, respectively. Along these lines, Bown and Crowley (2007) is the paper closest in spirit to our analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It demonstrates that anti-dumping tariffs have import-restricting effects. Park [23] in his works analysed the influence of anti-dumping tariffs on import studying Chinese data from 2002 to 2004 using Generalized Method of Moments (GMM). The results show that the anti-dumping protection has far-reaching effects on the inhibition and deflection of the trade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%