2021
DOI: 10.5195/philmed.2021.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trade-off between impartiality and freedom in the 21st Century Cures Act

Abstract: Randomized controlled trials test new drugs using various debiasing devices to prevent participantsfrom manipulating the trials. But participants often dislike controls, arguing that they impose apaternalist constraint on their legitimate preferences. The 21st Century Cures Act, passed by USCongress in 2016, encourages the Food and Drug Administration to use alternative testing methods,incorporating participants’ preferences, for regulatory purposes. We discuss, from a historicalperspective, the trade-off betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What these initiatives risk creating then is something short of well-developed solidarity, but rather, an ephemeral alliance and confluence of interests between individuals who might then be find themselves to face the consequences alone. The regulatory trend towards allowing patients more freedom to experiment with treatment courses means that the risk calculus is becoming more complex just as patients gain more freedom to do it themselves (Carrieri, Peccatori, and Boniolo, 2018;Navarro, Tempini, and Teira, 2021;Tempini and Teira, 2020).…”
Section: Contribution and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What these initiatives risk creating then is something short of well-developed solidarity, but rather, an ephemeral alliance and confluence of interests between individuals who might then be find themselves to face the consequences alone. The regulatory trend towards allowing patients more freedom to experiment with treatment courses means that the risk calculus is becoming more complex just as patients gain more freedom to do it themselves (Carrieri, Peccatori, and Boniolo, 2018;Navarro, Tempini, and Teira, 2021;Tempini and Teira, 2020).…”
Section: Contribution and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to be safe and efficacious. Patient groups and drug manufacturers have advocated for patients, with the guidance of their physicians, to have the autonomy to choose their own medications, as they are the ones who experience the effects of the drugs [35][36][37][38]. When there is little time and less (good) evidence than normal, should drug regulators provide patients with more freedom to choose?…”
Section: Concepts Of Risk Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%