1982
DOI: 10.2307/3586563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trait Structure of Cloze Test Scores

Abstract: In the present study, the trait structure of a cloze test was examined using confirmatory factor analysis. A cloze passage with rationally selected deletions of syntactic and cohesive items was constructed and given to two groups of non-native English speaking students entering the University of Illinois. A trait structure with three specific traits and one general trait provided the best explanation of the data. The results suggest that a modified cloze passage, using rational deletions, is capable of measuri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
6

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
74
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some researchers consider cloze tests unsuitable as measures of the comprehension of long-range syntactic or semantic relations (e.g., Alderson, 1980;Shanahan, Kamil, & Tobin, 1982), other researchers believe that they reflect a degree of global comprehension beyond the clause or sentence level, as well as knowledge of orthographic, morphological, and syntactic rules (Bachman, 1982;Chihara, Oller, Weaver, & Chávez-Oller, 1977;Jonz, 1990). Proponents have also ad-dressed other criticisms of the cloze procedure regarding inconsistent results and other "technical" problems (see Jonz & Oller, 1994;KleinBraley & Raatz, 1984).…”
Section: In 1984 Alderson Launched a Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some researchers consider cloze tests unsuitable as measures of the comprehension of long-range syntactic or semantic relations (e.g., Alderson, 1980;Shanahan, Kamil, & Tobin, 1982), other researchers believe that they reflect a degree of global comprehension beyond the clause or sentence level, as well as knowledge of orthographic, morphological, and syntactic rules (Bachman, 1982;Chihara, Oller, Weaver, & Chávez-Oller, 1977;Jonz, 1990). Proponents have also ad-dressed other criticisms of the cloze procedure regarding inconsistent results and other "technical" problems (see Jonz & Oller, 1994;KleinBraley & Raatz, 1984).…”
Section: In 1984 Alderson Launched a Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the validity and reliability of the test were supported by numerous researchers (e.g., Darnell, 1968;Jongsma, 1971;Oller, 1972), the tests have been used as a major measurement of overall language proficiency since the 1970s (see Jongsma, 1971;Oller, 1976;Robinson, 1972). There are some opponents who are skeptical of the effects of cloze tests, claiming that the tests only measure the ability to make localized connections in the texts (Alderson, 1980;Porter, 1983;Bachman, 1982 and1985). However, Alderson (1979) and Readance, Balwin, Bean, and Dishner (1980) state that the cloze tests are a particularly valid measure of reading comprehension as well as text readability for native speakers of English, and are one of the most useful tools for assessing reading comprehension level, learning process, and accurate grammatical knowledge of EFL learners.…”
Section: Cloze Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bormuth (1969) argued that cloze test scores are highly correlated with scores in standard tests aimed at measuring reading comprehension skill. Bachman (1982) suggested that cloze tests can be used in assessing advanced skills such as coherence and consistence.…”
Section: Cloze Testmentioning
confidence: 99%