2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The trans-Neptunian object size distribution at small sizes

Abstract: Aims. The aim of this work is to estimate the size distribution of small Trans-Neptunian objects. Methods. We simulate the irradiation and collisional processes affecting the surface of a Trans-Neptunian object for the first time using as a constraint the peculiar crystalline to amorphous water ice ratio observed on (136108) 2003 EL 61 . Results. We find that the size distribution changes its exponent from q 0 = 4.2 at larger sizes to q 1 = 2.40 ± 0.3 at the smaller ones, with a break radius of r 1 = 35 ± 15 k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our models in this paper match the slope below the break but not the location of the break. Kenyon & Bromley (2004c) demonstrate that stirring from the largest nearby planet sets the 'break radius' (see also Gil-Hutton et al 2009;Fraser 2009). For TNOs, continued stirring by Neptune at 30 AU yields a break at 10-30 km, close to the lower limit inferred from current observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our models in this paper match the slope below the break but not the location of the break. Kenyon & Bromley (2004c) demonstrate that stirring from the largest nearby planet sets the 'break radius' (see also Gil-Hutton et al 2009;Fraser 2009). For TNOs, continued stirring by Neptune at 30 AU yields a break at 10-30 km, close to the lower limit inferred from current observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di Sisto and Brunini (2011) analyzed the number and size-frequency distribution (SFD) of SDOs based on the works of Parker and Kavelaars (2010b,a). They adopted a broken power-law size distribution with a differential index of large objects given by s 1 = 4.7 (Elliot et al 2005), a break at diameters d ∼ 60 km and two limit values for the differential index s 2 = 2.5 and 3.5 for d < 60 km given the uncertainty of the SFD for small objects (Bernstein et al 2004;Gil-Hutton et al 2009;Fraser and Kavelaars 2009;Fuentes and Holman 2008;Fuentes et al 2009). However, the recent discoveries by OSSOS increased the number of small SDOs and Centaurs and allowed for new estimations of the SFD and number of objects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative scenario might be the collisional resurfacing, which may explain other phenomena in the transneptunian belt (Gil-Hutton 2002;Gil-Hutton et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%