2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511675768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Abstract: A comprehensive exposition of the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics (TI), this book sheds new light on longstanding problems in quantum theory and provides insight into the compatibility of TI with relativity. It breaks new ground in interpreting quantum theory, presenting a compelling new picture of quantum reality. The book shows how TI can be used to solve the measurement problem of quantum mechanics and explain other puzzles, such as the origin of the 'Born Rule' for the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest one is probably Bohmian mechanics which, irrespective of personal preferences, provides a clear and consistent way to describe fundamental particles in full agreement with quantum mechanics. Other counterexamples are many-world theories [17], transactional approaches [18] or consistent histories [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest one is probably Bohmian mechanics which, irrespective of personal preferences, provides a clear and consistent way to describe fundamental particles in full agreement with quantum mechanics. Other counterexamples are many-world theories [17], transactional approaches [18] or consistent histories [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later Cramer [9] introduced his transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics, also using absorber theory, which is fully consistent with the Copenhagen interpretation but eliminates the instantaneous collapsing wave function. See the new book by Cramer [10] and the book by Kastner [11].…”
Section: Absorber Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, there are those who continue to hold out hope. One prominent strategy for evading the no-go theorems is to invoke retrocausality-the hypothesis that causal in 鈥ences can travel from later events to earlier events, as well as in the usual fashion from earlier events to later events (Cramer, 1986;Kastner, 2013;Price, 1994;Price and Wharton, 2013;Sutherland, 2008;Wharton, 2010). How does this strategy fare against the challenge of protective measurement?…”
Section: Ensemble Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%