1966
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(66)90117-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transfer matrix method seen as one method of structural analysis among others

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we combine equation (29) with equation (25), the buckling mode can be obtained. In order to demonstrate the method, two typical examples are considered: a C-section member and a Z-section member.…”
Section: Illustrations Of Open Cross-section Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we combine equation (29) with equation (25), the buckling mode can be obtained. In order to demonstrate the method, two typical examples are considered: a C-section member and a Z-section member.…”
Section: Illustrations Of Open Cross-section Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The classical transfer matrix method (TMM) has been developed as an effective tool for structural analysis, especially for chain connected system from topological perspective. 29 By combining the TMM and FEM, the finite element-transfer matrix method (FE-TMM) is developed to analyze the static and dynamic of structural problems. 30 And then a structural analysis method, named as boundary element-transfer matrix method (BE-TMM), is proposed for the vibration analysis of two-dimensional plate acted by uniform 31 and concentrated 32 loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the transfer matrix, the finite element method has the advantage of accurately modeling rotor bearing systems with a fewer number of elements while being less sensitive to numerical instabilities, although sometimes it requires more CPU time and computer storage (Ruhl and Booker, 1972). On the other hand, with the transfer matrix approach, as problem size increases, numerical difficulties arise (Uhrig, 1966 (1963,1965), Ruhl and Booker (1972) used cubic hermitian-shape functions to formulate the shaft element matrices, including only the elastic bending energy and kientic energy. Using the Rayleigh beam theory, Nelson and McVaugh (1976) generalized the work of Ruhl and Booker by the addition of other factors, such as rotatry inertia, gyroscopic moments, and axial load.…”
Section: Rotating Shaft Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Compared with other matrix methods of structural analysis, such as the displacement method and the force method, TMM uses both displacements and internal forces at nodal points of the structure. 2 Later, many improvements and applications of TMM have been found from a science research and engineering technology point of view. For science research, the Riccati transformation can be regarded as an important tool to improve numerical stability of transfer computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%