1969
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.01.010169.001533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Transition From Continuum to Molecular Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The explicit expressions for the relevant collision integrals are presented in Sect. 4. As representative examples, we evaluate these collision integrals for the drag coefficient of a disc in Sect.…”
Section: Knmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The explicit expressions for the relevant collision integrals are presented in Sect. 4. As representative examples, we evaluate these collision integrals for the drag coefficient of a disc in Sect.…”
Section: Knmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit 0 Kn → corresponds to the continuum regime in which one needs to solve the full nonlinear Boltzmann equation subject to the appropriate boundary conditions. A proper theory for the drag force at arbitrary Knudsen numbers is an interesting and important challenge [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In the absence of reliable theoretical predictions, one often resorts to empirical correlations [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in shale reservoirs, which have pore throat radii in the range of 1 to 200 nanometers, fluid continuum theory breaks down and gas molecules follow a somewhat random path while still maintaining a general flow direction governed by pressure gradient. Molecules strike against the pore walls and tend to slip at pore walls instead of having zero velocity (Sherman, 1969). Although these phenomena can be modeled accurately using molecular physics, this is not practical for modeling flow of natural gas through shale reservoirs, which requires intensive computation that falls beyond current computational capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maxwell (1887) first pointed out from kinetic point of view that the "non-slip boundary condition" in continuum theory is not always the truth, the temperature jump and velocity slip at the wall will become significant under certain situation [3]. Sherman further illustrated that the continuum theory starts to fail near the wall as the flow became rarefied [4]. Early studies on rarefied gas are mostly focused on the boundary condition and wall properties in the slip flow regime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%