1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(73)90062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The transmission of sound through a cavity-backed finite plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The sketch of the two-dimensional structural-acoustic coupling system with one flexible beam subject to simply-supported boundary condition Fig. 2 Cubic acoustic-cavity with one elastic plate of threedimensional coupled system the acoustic cavity, which includes the mass source term and the effect of structural motion [18,25], is represented as:…”
Section: Acoustic Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The sketch of the two-dimensional structural-acoustic coupling system with one flexible beam subject to simply-supported boundary condition Fig. 2 Cubic acoustic-cavity with one elastic plate of threedimensional coupled system the acoustic cavity, which includes the mass source term and the effect of structural motion [18,25], is represented as:…”
Section: Acoustic Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get rid of the limitations on numerical simulations such as mesh generations and singular integrals, the MFS can be seen as an easier method to treat the coupled system. The coupled system is modeled as the acoustic fields with an interface of elastic structures [18]. Practical examples include the noise problems of automobile mufflers, hermetic compressors [19] and passenger compartments of automobiles and aircraft in mechanics, especially the earmuff-earcanal system [20] and the aerospace structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many researchers such as Narayanan [1], Lee [2][3][4][5][6][7], Lyon [8], Pretlove [9], Jackson [10], Guy [11], Dowell [12] and Oldham [13,14] developed their models to predict the insertion loss performance or transmission loss performance of a cavity-backed rectangular enclosure panel. Their predictions have clearly indicated that the (1,1) mode structural resonance is much more important than others on the noise reduction performance Although the rectangular enclosure models [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and the present enclosure model are simplified and different from a practical close-fitting enclosure which has more than one panel and boundary conditions are more complicated, the theoretical predictions provide a close look at the importance of the acoustical and structural resonance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dowell and Voss investigated the modal response of a cavity-backed plate [2]. Since then, there have been continuous efforts to improve the understanding of sound transmission through panels into cavities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The previous research were based on a regular model (a rectangular enclosure with a flexible boundary).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%