2005
DOI: 10.2307/3650070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Trap of Backwardness: Modernity, Temporality, and the Study of Eastern European Nationalism

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Slavic Review.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of associating difference with temporal discontinuity is perhaps best represented by the work of Johannes Fabian (1983) whose account of the ‘denial of coevalness’ (or a denial of a ‘shared time’) has been a touchstone for work exploring the uses of time in practices of inclusion and exclusion. Other work in the study showed how similar mechanisms operated in relation to Romani peoples (Trumpener, 1992), Indigenous Australians (Lloyd, 2000) and more broadly in relation to Eastern Europe (Todorova, 2005) and indeed all ‘developing’ peoples (Helliwell and Hindess, 2005). An important subtlety here is that the denial of coevalness might posit that an excluded group is capable of change, but has simply not ‘kept up’ with Western societies and so are disjointed from the community, or there might be stronger claims that the group in question is incapable of change and is therefore completely discontinuous from the community (Frink et al., 2002; Jordan, 1995).…”
Section: Cross-cutting Themesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The method of associating difference with temporal discontinuity is perhaps best represented by the work of Johannes Fabian (1983) whose account of the ‘denial of coevalness’ (or a denial of a ‘shared time’) has been a touchstone for work exploring the uses of time in practices of inclusion and exclusion. Other work in the study showed how similar mechanisms operated in relation to Romani peoples (Trumpener, 1992), Indigenous Australians (Lloyd, 2000) and more broadly in relation to Eastern Europe (Todorova, 2005) and indeed all ‘developing’ peoples (Helliwell and Hindess, 2005). An important subtlety here is that the denial of coevalness might posit that an excluded group is capable of change, but has simply not ‘kept up’ with Western societies and so are disjointed from the community, or there might be stronger claims that the group in question is incapable of change and is therefore completely discontinuous from the community (Frink et al., 2002; Jordan, 1995).…”
Section: Cross-cutting Themesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Some argue that Brexit has interrupted the potential futures of EU citizens in the UK, a temporal disjuncture to their continued security as citizens (Lulle et al, 2017). Yet others highlight the feeling of being "left behind" and excluded is not new and reflects a long-standing discourse of the "backwardness" of Eastern Europeans (Todorova, 2005).…”
Section: Rethinking Community As Relationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un'altra prospettiva che ci sembra promettente è quella di uscire dall'ottica centro-periferia, che a lungo ha dominato gli studi storici sull'Europa del Sud-Est, in base alla quale questa regione sarebbe un angolo del continente marginale e passivo, dominato da legami prepolitici basati sul sangue e la religione, mero ricettacolo di discorsi e pratiche politiche elaborate altrove. Gli studi sul «balcanismo» hanno invece sottolineato i caratteri transnazionali delle tradizioni politiche balcaniche, che si inseriscono in contesti più ampi 5 . Anche le forme di governance elaborate tra le due guerre in Jugoslavia possono essere lette alla luce del contesto europeo e del Mediterraneo orientale.…”
unclassified