1994
DOI: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)90170-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The treatment of chromium wastewaters using the sorptive potential of leaf mould

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1), the maximum removal of chromium was 90% for (CAC-S) and for (OS-S) was 82% from a solution 4 mg/L at pH 1.5. There was a sharp decline in percent adsorption with an increase in either pH or concentration of Cr(VI) of the aqueous solution due to the fact that the covalent coordination bonds between Cr (III) ions and the surface functional groups of both activated carbons, such as carboxylic and hydroxyl are very weak in basic conditions (Sharma and Foster, 1994). Maximum adsorption was observed at pH 1.5.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(1), the maximum removal of chromium was 90% for (CAC-S) and for (OS-S) was 82% from a solution 4 mg/L at pH 1.5. There was a sharp decline in percent adsorption with an increase in either pH or concentration of Cr(VI) of the aqueous solution due to the fact that the covalent coordination bonds between Cr (III) ions and the surface functional groups of both activated carbons, such as carboxylic and hydroxyl are very weak in basic conditions (Sharma and Foster, 1994). Maximum adsorption was observed at pH 1.5.…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Phmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Bio s o rp tio n o f t o xic h eav y metals b y biomaterials has been suggested as a potential alternative to the conventional methods for recovery of toxic heavy metals f ro m w as te w at er [ 1 -2 ] . M an y b io mate r ia ls s u ch asmic ro-algae [3], fungi [4], fungal b io mass [5][6][7], walnut hull [8], almond green hull [9], Helianthus annuus stem waste [10], banana skin, green tea waste, oak leaf, walnut shell, peanut shell and rice husk [11], Ocimum a mericanum L. seed pods [12], chemically modified coir p ith [13], groundnut shell [14], activated carbon from ta marind wood activated with zinc chloride [15], olive stone [16], grape waste [17], hazelnut [18], walnut, hazelnut and almond shell [19], p istachio hull waste [20], agriculture wastes, carbons [21], rice husk-based active carbon [22], fruit shell of gulmohar [23], coconut husk [24], husk of bengal gram [25], eucalyptus bark [26], agricultural waste biomass [27], pine needles [28], sugar cane bagasse [29], leaf mou ld [30] and waste pomace of olive factory [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of biomaterials even makes adsorption more environmentally friendly, more cost effective, and more technically feasible. A number of adsorbents, such as Casurina leave (Ranganathan 2003), leaf mould (Sarma and Foster 1994), coconut waste (Selvi et al 2001), rubber wood (Raji and Anirudhan 1997), etc. were used for Cr (VI) abatement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%