1968
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315400034639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The treatment of food by prosobranch veligers

Abstract: A study of nineteen species of monotocardian veligers belonging to eight different superfamilies reveals the uniformity of structure of the alimentary tract up to the time of metamorphosis. Results of feeding experiments with nineteen species of unicellular algae show that there is also uniformity in the functioning of the gut.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3B1; for other gastropod veligers, see refs. 15 and 16). After settlement on Laurencia pacifica, which is destined to serve as their diet after metamorphosis, veligers stop eating unicellular algae and do not feed until metamorphosis is complete.…”
Section: Behavioral Transformations At Metamorphosismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…3B1; for other gastropod veligers, see refs. 15 and 16). After settlement on Laurencia pacifica, which is destined to serve as their diet after metamorphosis, veligers stop eating unicellular algae and do not feed until metamorphosis is complete.…”
Section: Behavioral Transformations At Metamorphosismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Epiphytic grazer; detritivore Graham (1988), Fretter and Montgomery (1968), Prathep et al (2003), Fretter and Graham (1981), Wigham (1976), Fretter and Graham (1978) …”
Section: Rissoa Parvamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epiphytic grazer; detritivore Graham (1988), Fretter and Montgomery (1968), Graham (1978, 1981) Rissoella diaphana Epiphytic grazer; deposit feeder Rueda et al (2009), Graham (1988, Fretter (1948Fretter ( , 1951, Fretter and Graham (1981) Rissoella opalina Epiphytic grazer; deposit feeder Graham (1988), Fretter (1948Fretter ( , 1951, Fretter and Graham (1981) Sabella pavonina Suspension feeder Hunt (1925), Fauchald and Jumars (1979), Day (1967) (2005), Pearre (1976), Sullivan (1980), Brodeur and Terazaki (1999), Terazaki (1993Terazaki ( , 2004, Alvarez-Cadena (1993) Scrupocellaria spp.…”
Section: Rissoa Sarsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stocking density and algal concentration are two more important factors influencing the success of hatchery seed culture for planktotrophic larvae in marine molluscs, because they are easier to manipulate than other environmental factors in artificial larval production systems. Therefore, the effects of stocking density or food concentration on larval survival, growth and metamorphosis have been well documented in marine molluscs (Fretter & Montgomery 1968; Pilkington & Fretter 1970; Perron & Turner 1977; Aldana‐Aranda, Lucas, Brule, Salguero & Rendon 1989; Pechenik, Eyster, Widdows & Bayne 1990; Hansen 1991; His & Seaman 1992; Pechenik, Estrella & Hammer 1996; Avila, Grenier, Tamse & Kuzirian 1997; Preece, Shepherd, Clarke & Keesing 1997; Doroudi & Southgate 2000; Pechenik, Jarrett & Rooney 2002; Powell, Bochenek, John, Klinck & Hofmann 2002; Daume, Huchette, Ryan & Day 2003; Zhao, Qiu & Qian 2003; Zheng, Ke, Zhou & Li 2005; Liu, Dong, Tang, Zhang & Xiang 2006; Yan, Zhang & Yang 2006; Mazón‐Suástegui, Ruíz‐Ruíz, Parres‐Haro & Saucedo 2008; Raghavan & Gopinathan 2008; Capo, Bardales, Gillette, Lara, Schmale & Serafy 2009; Rico‐Villa & Robert 2009). In general, larvae, reared under a lower stocking density or higher food concentration conditions, have higher survival, faster growth and more metamorphosed individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%