1943
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1943.tb00429.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Tribe Thrinchini of the Subfamily Pamphaginae, and the Interrelations of the Acridid Subfamilies (Orthoptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

1951
1951
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ramme (1933) describing Prionotropis urfensis, separated it from P. maculinervis by the shape of the male pronotum which should be more robust, more arched and convex, coarser tubercles and a steeper typical sulcus in lateral view and by the coloration of the hind legs, of which hind femur has a discoloured inner side (instead of blackish), hind tibia pale orange instead of reddish-yellow to red. However, Uvarov (1943) considered the morphological differences of P. urfensis small and moved it at subspecies level of P. maculinervis, because of the coloration of the hind legs. Ramme (1951) agreed with Uvarov's opinion and treated P. urfensis as a subspecies of P. maculinervis.…”
Section: Prionotropis Azamimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ramme (1933) describing Prionotropis urfensis, separated it from P. maculinervis by the shape of the male pronotum which should be more robust, more arched and convex, coarser tubercles and a steeper typical sulcus in lateral view and by the coloration of the hind legs, of which hind femur has a discoloured inner side (instead of blackish), hind tibia pale orange instead of reddish-yellow to red. However, Uvarov (1943) considered the morphological differences of P. urfensis small and moved it at subspecies level of P. maculinervis, because of the coloration of the hind legs. Ramme (1951) agreed with Uvarov's opinion and treated P. urfensis as a subspecies of P. maculinervis.…”
Section: Prionotropis Azamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When they were discovered, both P. rhodanica and P. azami were considered to be disjoint populations of the Balkanic P. hystrix (Chopard 1922). However, Uvarov (1923) found differences between the two populations and named them P. hystrix azami and P. hystrix rhodanica respectively, but later he raised P. rhodanica to species level, and maintained azami as subspecies of hystrix (Uvarov 1943). Also Harz (1975) followed this arrangement, while Foucart (1995), finding a wide variability within the populations of the three taxa, proposed to consider again azami and rhodanica subspecies of P. hystrix, as in the initial view of Uvarov (1923).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study we recorded 16 species and described a new species belonging to the Pamphagus djelfensis complex (Benkenana et al, 2012) in Eastern Algeria, based on the revisions of Chopard (1943), Uvarov (1943), Descamps & Mounassif, 1972), Biondi & Massa (1995), Massa & Cusimano (1979), Massa & Biondi (1987), Massa & Lo Verde (1990), Massa et al (1993) and Massa (1992Massa ( , 1996. In particular, we studied the distribution, climatic constraints and some aspects of the biology of each species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%