1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(98)00595-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘triplet-excited region’ in linear polyenes: Real or artifactual?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors related this central domain of diminishing bond alternation to bond orders and postulated a “triplet-excited” region. Subsequent investigations by Takahasi et al , pointed out the deficiencies in this approach: Their single-excitation CI (SCI) calculations on the series of polyenes from C 8 H 18 to C 22 H 46 yielded geometries in agreement with Kuki et al However, comparison calculations with CASSCF on octatetraene gave a considerably different bond alternation pattern which is consistent with our present calculations. Takahashi et al concluded the appearance of the postulated “triplet-excited region” to be artifactual in SCI and SDCI calculations, related to the use of RHF MOs in combination with limitations on the excitations in the CI space.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors related this central domain of diminishing bond alternation to bond orders and postulated a “triplet-excited” region. Subsequent investigations by Takahasi et al , pointed out the deficiencies in this approach: Their single-excitation CI (SCI) calculations on the series of polyenes from C 8 H 18 to C 22 H 46 yielded geometries in agreement with Kuki et al However, comparison calculations with CASSCF on octatetraene gave a considerably different bond alternation pattern which is consistent with our present calculations. Takahashi et al concluded the appearance of the postulated “triplet-excited region” to be artifactual in SCI and SDCI calculations, related to the use of RHF MOs in combination with limitations on the excitations in the CI space.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…77,78 pointed out the deficiencies in this approach: Their single-excitation CI (SCI) calculations on the series of polyenes from C 8 H 18 to C 22 H 46 yielded geometries in agreement with Kuki et al However, comparison calculations with CASSCF on octatetraene gave a considerably different bond alternation pattern which is consistent with our present calculations. Takahashi et al…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This conclusion was later doubted by Takahashi et al, after a comparative study of ab initio SCI calculations on a lot of oligomers against complete-active-space self-consistant-field ͑CASSCF͒ calculations on a shorter member, octatetraene. 7 While the SCI calculations well reproduced the ''triplet-excited region'' in the central part of the chains, CASSCF gave a basically very different geometry; it seems that there exist two independent delocalized regions ͑soliton-antisoliton pair͒ located symmetrically away from the center of the oligomer chain. The inconsistency between CASSCF and SCI computations was ascribed to the insufficient account of electron correlations in ab initio SCI or semiempirical SDCI schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] In theoretical studies, it has been well accepted that in T 1 states, the single and double bonds at the central region are swapped, which makes cis-trans conformation interconversions possible. [5][6][7][8][9] However, there is an interesting disagreement on the details of T 1 -state geometries optimized with different methods. In 1991, Kuki et al performed the Pariser-Parr-Pople ͑PPP͒ SDCI calculations on different lengths of polyene oligomers (C 10 H 12 , C 14 H 16 , C 18 H 20 , and C 22 H 24 ), finding that the bond length alternation disappears only in the central moiety of the polyene oligomer in the triplet excitation from the S 0 ground state; furthermore, the length of this delocalized region kept constant with the oligomer size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%