We question widely held assumptions about the origins of huanglongbing (HLB) and the genus Citrus [Rutaceae: Aurantioideae: Aurantieae] and propose alternative hypotheses. In doing so, we comment on recent changes in the systematics of the family Rutaceae, particularly the subfamily Aurantioideae.The widely accepted assumptions are that the genus Citrus originated in China and that HLB originated, in Citrus, in the same region. We present evidence that suggests: that Citrus evolved in Australasia (where HLB and its vectors do not occur naturally); and that 'Candidatus Liberibacter' forms known to infect Citrus and other Rutaceae originated in Africa in association with the African citrus psyllid, Trioza erytreae (del Guercio) [Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Triozidae] and one or more species of Vepris [Rutaceae: Rutoideae].Other evidence suggests that the 'Ca. Liberibacter' forms that cause HLB spread from Africa to India in infected citrus budwood or plants, then from India to Guangdong in China (directly or indirectly) about 1930, then from Guangdong to Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia after 1945, and subsequently more widely to other countries.Ours view that HLB did not originate in China is supported by published literature and other documents that have not been cited in major reviews of HLB and its vectors, particularly the Asiatic citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama [Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae].Recent hypothesis about the origins of 'Ca. Liberibacter' in Gondwana 100-300 million years ago, and the possible role of parasitic plants in natural spread of the bacteria, are considered. Our views are continually being revised as new information, including historical records, becomes available.