2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The tumor suppressor homolog in fission yeast, myh1+, displays a strong interaction with the checkpoint gene rad1+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 9‐1‐1 complex has previously been reported to stimulate the DNA repair activity of BER [Toueille et al, ; Friedrich‐Heineken et al, ], increasing the recruitment of BER enzymes to DNA damage sites [Helt et al, ]. In the current work, we confirm a strong genetic interaction between myh1 + and the checkpoint sensor gene rad1 + [Jansson et al, ] in that deletion of components causes hypersensitivity to both platinum compounds as well as to DNA DSB inducing agents. We and others have previously shown that the individual components of the 9‐1‐1 complex have different propensities to interact genetically and physically with Myh1 after different treatments such as H 2 O 2 , UV radiation, MMS, and HU [Chang and Lu, ; Jansson et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 9‐1‐1 complex has previously been reported to stimulate the DNA repair activity of BER [Toueille et al, ; Friedrich‐Heineken et al, ], increasing the recruitment of BER enzymes to DNA damage sites [Helt et al, ]. In the current work, we confirm a strong genetic interaction between myh1 + and the checkpoint sensor gene rad1 + [Jansson et al, ] in that deletion of components causes hypersensitivity to both platinum compounds as well as to DNA DSB inducing agents. We and others have previously shown that the individual components of the 9‐1‐1 complex have different propensities to interact genetically and physically with Myh1 after different treatments such as H 2 O 2 , UV radiation, MMS, and HU [Chang and Lu, ; Jansson et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We previously described a role of Myh1 in repair of UV radiation-induced DNA damage [Jansson et al, 2008]. In light of the previously found specific genetic interaction between the myh1 and rad1 mutations for UV sensitivity [Jansson et al, 2008], we here analyzed how combined deficiencies in myh1 1 and in either of the 9-1-1 sensor components influenced sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents causing crosslinks and/or breaks in DNA, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors did not offer any mechanism for MYH-dependent DNA damage response by UV damage or replication stress. In S. pombe , myh1 knockout cells confers a very mild UV and HU sensitivity [53,54]; only myh1 rad1 double mutant display enhanced sensitivity to UV and HU as compared to single mutants [54]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there are a number of reports that show that loss of MUTYH actually can sensitize cells to DNA damaging agents. Along this line, double mutations in S. pombe MUTYH with RAD1 or, to a lesser extent RAD9 , were shown to enhance the sensitivity of the cells to DNA damaging agents and hydroxyurea (Jansson et al, 2008). The consequences of these deficiencies were chromosome segregation defects and checkpoint failure after UV irradiation, as well as morphological defects, even in the absence of DNA damaging agents.…”
Section: Function Of Muty and Mutyhmentioning
confidence: 99%