Comparative Policy Agendas 2019
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198835332.003.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Turkish Policy Agendas Project

Abstract: How do politicians respond to the policy priorities of the public in developing democracies? Do policymakers take into account their electoral mandate during their tenure in parliament? How does the relationship between media and politics work in a country that has a history of authoritarianism? The Turkish Policy Agendas Project aims to answer questions similar to these by providing systematic institutional data. The project content codes various parliamentary activities such as parliamentary debates, oral an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make use of two original datasets that include over thirty-five thousand parliamentary speeches and the demographic and political characteristics of representatives who served in the GNAT between 1995 and 2011. The parliamentary questions were first content-coded based on the coding scheme of the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP) and then collapsed by individual MPs to merge with representative characteristics (see Bulut and Yildirim 2019). As the second step, we have compiled data about MPs’ renomination and changes in the party rank over four election cycles, which left us with 2,140 MPs who served in the parliament during the period under investigation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make use of two original datasets that include over thirty-five thousand parliamentary speeches and the demographic and political characteristics of representatives who served in the GNAT between 1995 and 2011. The parliamentary questions were first content-coded based on the coding scheme of the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP) and then collapsed by individual MPs to merge with representative characteristics (see Bulut and Yildirim 2019). As the second step, we have compiled data about MPs’ renomination and changes in the party rank over four election cycles, which left us with 2,140 MPs who served in the parliament during the period under investigation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the bills coded as feminist bills address issues such as violence against women, prenatal rights, women’s labor force participation, and gender pay gaps. In order to see the general patterns of PMBs initiation among male and female MPs, I have also coded PMBs into feminine and masculine issue areas following Bäck and Debus (2019) and adapting their categorization to the Turkish Policy Agendas Project (Bulut and Yildirim 2019, 2020). The categorization of CAP topics to feminine and masculine issue areas as well as sample coding of the data is presented in the online appendix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for an activity to be constituencyoriented, it should mention MP's electoral district or the organizations and events that are known to have taken place in the province. The coders then assigned a topic category to each parliamentary activity using the codebook of the Turkish Policy Agendas Project (Bulut and Yildirim ) . Finally, these assigned topics were recoded as “hard,” “soft,” or “neutral” following Bäck, Debus, and Müller's () issue classification.…”
Section: Empirical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%