2018
DOI: 10.1177/0309364617690393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Turkish version of the Brace Questionnaire in brace-treated adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract: The Turkish version of the Brace Questionnaire to measure the effects of brace treatment on quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was found to have good validity, excellent reliability, and high internal consistency. Clinical relevance We recommend routine use of the Brace Questionnaire in scoliosis patients to evaluate brace-related quality of life and relevant factors and to support the individual when necessary during such treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to validity, most domains of the C-BrQ were acceptably correlated to the C-SRS-22 and the results were similar to those by Angelo AG 9 , and Lim and Gür G et al 11,12 In our research, all Lenke subtypes were covered in the participants' clinical characteristics. However, the sample size was small and Lenke classi cation was not used to classify participants in the previous studies, which might explain the Cronbach's alpha coe cient of our study was different from that in those studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With regard to validity, most domains of the C-BrQ were acceptably correlated to the C-SRS-22 and the results were similar to those by Angelo AG 9 , and Lim and Gür G et al 11,12 In our research, all Lenke subtypes were covered in the participants' clinical characteristics. However, the sample size was small and Lenke classi cation was not used to classify participants in the previous studies, which might explain the Cronbach's alpha coe cient of our study was different from that in those studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…-For items 1, 2, 3,7,8,9,10,11,13,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31, 32, 33 and 34: "Always", 1 point; "Most of the time", 2 points; "Sometimes", 3 points; "Almost never", 4 points; "Never", 5 points.…”
Section: Adaptation Of Brqmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, BrQ was designed specifically for AIS patients wearing braces as their primary treatment modality. Since its publication in 2006, BrQ has undergone cross-cultural adaptation into multiple foreign languages (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Our current study introduced the Chinese version of BrQ following standard protocols of translation and cultural adaptation, which can be used as a clinical evaluation tool for Chinese patients AIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To specifically evaluate the HRQoL of AIS patients under bracing treatment, Vasiliadis et al (11) first introduced the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ), which included eight domains (general health perception, physical functioning, emotional functioning, self-esteem and aesthetics, vitality, school activity, bodily pain and social functioning). The BrQ was initially developed and validated in Greek, and has been translated into Polish (12), Italian (13), French (14), Korean (15), Turkish (16), and Persian (17) and found to be valid. We herein aimed to culturally adapt and psychometrically validate the contemporary Chinese version of BrQ following the standard protocol of transcultural validation as demonstrated in previous literature (18).…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%