The Turn Taking Strategy Used by Prabowo and Jokowi in the Presidential Election Debate 2019

Yunus, Syarifudin; Eliastuti, Maguna

doi:10.5220/0009001504600467

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Feeling that she has already known what AR meant by his interruption, NS then closed the dialog while inviting the audience to watch the commercial break. From the dialog, it is discovered the practice of yielding the floor of turn-taking in which the host allows the guests to speak by asking questions (Mey, 2001;Yunus & Eliastuti, 2020). Likewise, the interruption was found to the previous two utterances.…”

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Political Talk Show on the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election

Muhassin

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Political discourse on the 2019 Indonesian presidential election has been studied from a variety of linguistic viewpoints. However, the pros and cons discourse on Joko Widodo's coalition with Prabowo in spite of their rivalry has not been examined through critical discourse analysis. This study aims to explore the text structure, social cognition, and social context of the pros dan cons discourse as the theme of Mata Najwa talk show. This is a kind of qualitative analytical research using van Dijk’s (1996, 2015) critical discourse analysis framework. The data comprised utterances of the talk show participants examined through three levels of analysis: description of text structure, interpretation of social cognition, and explanation of social context. The study found the use of macrostructure, superstructure, and microstructure as textual elements that support the discourse theme. Meanwhile, the theme selection is influenced by the host’s ideology that serves the theme's pro-coalition stance. The social context underlying the discourse production is the representation of Joko Widodo, who utilized his power to forge a coalition with the opponents through political bargaining. The implication of this study is to increase public awareness on the importance of critically viewing political news so that the negative excesses of political propaganda do not easily provoke them through mass media.

show abstract

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Political Talk Show on the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election

Muhassin

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They can begin to make short sounds, normally rehashed, while the speaker is talking and regularly use body movements or outward appearances to flag that they remark. Some previous studies related to turn taking focusing on conversation (Sari et al, 2021); (Dewi et al, 2018); (Ashidiq, 2022), debate (Yunus & Eliastuti, 2019); (Dwi Natalia et al, 2020); (Nugraheni, 2016), and talkshow (Habibi et al, 2020); (Agustianto & Putera, 2020). Meanwhile, Azhimi (2016) analyzed several conversation turn-taking rules in "Ini talk show" TV program and found out that the strategies used are overlap, interruption, and repairs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Turn-Taking Strategies Used by Lincoln-Douglas Debate Final Round 2019

Febryanto,

Puspita Rizki

2023

JBIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to find out what kinds of turn-taking strategies are used in Lincoln-Douglas debate final round between Nehal Chigurupati as the affirmative speaker and Grace Johannes as the negative speaker. This study has two purposes: the first is to find out what kinds of turn-taking strategies are used by the Lincoln-Douglas debate, and the second is to find out the most dominant type of turn-taking strategies used by the Lincoln-Douglas final debate. A descriptive qualitative method was used in this study while Stenstrom’s (1994) theory was applied to analyze the data. The results show that 31 data were found which consist of taking the turn strategies (16), holding the turn (10), and yielding the turn (5). The findings imply that the most dominant strategy used by the Lincoln-Douglas debate is turn-taking strategies

show abstract

“…Whereas, Yunus & Eliastuti (2020) with the title The Turn Taking Strategy Used by Prabowo and Jokowi in the Presidential Election Debate 2019 conducted research on the turn-taking strategies employed by Prabowo and Jokowi during the 2019 presidential election debate. Using a descriptive qualitative methodology, they found that the strategy of taking the turn in the presidential debate demonstrates the speakers' linguistic abilities in addition to their ability to persuade voters depending on the interaction.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Turn Taking Strategy Used by Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the First Presidential Election Debate 2020

Sa'adah

2022

LILICS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research investigated the turn taking strategies that occurred in the first American Presidential Debate in 2020 between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The aim was to identify the kinds of turn taking strategies used in the first American Presidential Debate in 2020 between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, as well as to classify the functions of the turn taking that occur in the first American Presidential Debate in 2020 between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The researcher employed a descriptive qualitative approach because the data were derived from Donald Trump's and Joe Biden's utterances on YouTube video, which was transcribed and analyzed using Sterntörm's (2014) theory of turn taking strategy; taking the turn strategy, holding the turn strategy, and yielding the turn strategy. The data were analyzed by determining the context, categorizing the data based on the theory, analyzing and interpreting the data, then draw conclusion based on the findings. The findings revealed 35 data from Donald Trump’s utterances, with the most strategy used was alert that occurred twelve times, while he never used hesitant start strategy. On the other hand, 20 data were obtained from Joe Biden’s utterances. In fact, Joe Biden also employed alert strategy as the most utilized strategy which was the same as Donald Trump, but the occurrence was only for five times. In addition, Joe Biden did not apply four turn taking strategies which were hesitant start, metacomment, silent pause, and appealing. One important point to note is that both candidates utilized alert as the most used strategy, which has the function to interrupt the other speaker with raising the tone of his voice in order to attract the attention of the interlocutor.

show abstract

The Turn Taking Strategy Used by Prabowo and Jokowi in the Presidential Election Debate 2019

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Political Talk Show on the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election

A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Political Talk Show on the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Election

Turn-Taking Strategies Used by Lincoln-Douglas Debate Final Round 2019

Turn Taking Strategy Used by Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the First Presidential Election Debate 2020

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About