1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00169.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Two Disciplines of Personality Psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current theory also emphasizes the reciprocal influences between behaviors and traits (Cervone 1991). Not only can personality traits affect behavior, but behavior can also affect people's perceptions of their personality traits (Buss and Craik 1983).…”
Section: Self-perceived Personality Traits: Theoretical Issues and DImentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Current theory also emphasizes the reciprocal influences between behaviors and traits (Cervone 1991). Not only can personality traits affect behavior, but behavior can also affect people's perceptions of their personality traits (Buss and Craik 1983).…”
Section: Self-perceived Personality Traits: Theoretical Issues and DImentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yet, personality psychology is not a unified domain. According to Cervone (1991), there are two disciplines of personality psychology that are distinguished by how the basic units of personality are conceptualized. One discipline favors trait/dispositional constructs and understands personality structure in terms of between-person variation that is described by " top-down" abstract latent variable taxonomies, such as the Big 5.…”
Section: Models Of Personality Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAPS is a prominent theoretical approach to personality and not taking it up seems like a missed opportunity. Relatedly, Cervone [1991] argued that the science of personality divides into two disciplines on the basis of the units thought to constitute personality: traits or social cognitive constructs, such as schemas, scripts, expectancies, and so on. Perhaps the distinction is too Manichean for modern personality theory because trait dispositions and social cognition interpenetrate in complex ways, but do they interpenetrate at all?…”
Section: For the Next Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%