2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The two phases of core formation – orbital evolution in the centres of ellipticals with supermassive black hole binaries

Abstract: The flat stellar density cores of massive elliptical galaxies form rapidly due to sinking supermassive black holes (SMBH) in gas-poor galaxy mergers. After the SMBHs form a bound binary, gravitational slingshot interactions with nearby stars drive the core regions towards a tangentially biased stellar velocity distribution. We use collisionless galaxy merger simulations with accurate collisional orbit integration around the central SMBHs to demonstrate that the removal of stars from the centre by slingshot kic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical simulations of merging ETGs from Rantala et al (2019) and Frigo et al (2021) produced rotation and dispersion patterns matching those we discuss here. Their simulations suggest that counterrotating decoupled cores are the products of binary SMBH mergers that occur during the mergers of ETGs that produce cored ETGs, such as NGC 1407, NGC 5328, and NGC 5419.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical simulations of merging ETGs from Rantala et al (2019) and Frigo et al (2021) produced rotation and dispersion patterns matching those we discuss here. Their simulations suggest that counterrotating decoupled cores are the products of binary SMBH mergers that occur during the mergers of ETGs that produce cored ETGs, such as NGC 1407, NGC 5328, and NGC 5419.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, Mazzalay et al (2016) suggested that there are two SMBHs at a distance of ∼70 pc in the center of NGC 5419, which are associated with the double nuclei. In our central rotation map, the inner counterrotating regions appear to be connected to the larger velocity field in a way that suggests an inspiraling motion of the stars, which, in this scenario, would have been caused by dynamical drag of the sinking SMBHs/nuclei of the merging ETGs (Rantala et al 2019;Frigo et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Several observations suggest that the stellar populations of KDCs in some slowly rotating ETGs show little or no difference to the stellar populations of the surrounding host galaxies (Davies et al 2001;McDermid et al 2006;Nedelchev et al 2019;Kuntschner et al 2010). Recent high-resolution numerical simulations of gas-free mergers hosting SMBHs (Rantala et al 2019;Frigo et al 2021) provide another possible explanation for the origin of kinematically distinct velocity structures in such ETGs.…”
Section: Origin Of the Kinematically Distinct Corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cores naturally form in gas-poor mergers with supermassive black holes (SMBHs) (e.g., Begelman et al 1980;Hills & Fullerton 1980;Ebisuzaki et al 1991;Milosavljević & Merritt 2001;Merritt 2006;Rantala et al 2018;Nasim et al 2021). By using high-resolution simulations of galaxy mergers with SMBHs Rantala et al (2018) and Frigo et al (2021) recently revealed that the core formation actually happens in two phases: First, dynamical friction causes the two SMBHs of the progenitor galaxies to sink to the center of the merger remnant. This causes the surrounding stars to move to larger radii, happens rapidly (some tens of millions of years), and is the main driver of the formation of the shallow central stellar density core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tangential bias is observed in several massive ellipticals (Thomas et al 2014(Thomas et al , 2016Mehrgan et al 2019). It is likely due to the core scouring mechanism, which leads to an ejection of stars with radial orbits in the central regions (Rantala et al 2018(Rantala et al , 2019Frigo et al 2021). We tested four different projections of the simulation at four different viewing angles (see Fig.…”
Section: Data and Codementioning
confidence: 99%