1991
DOI: 10.1016/0149-1970(91)90043-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The U.K. nuclear accident model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical time scale for this depletion from gaseous to particulate form is, however, large (about 47 days (Maryon et al, 1991)) compared to the length of the model simulation (12 days in this study), so this effect is not taken into account here. Because of these uncertainties, both comprehensive and simple parameterizations of wet-and dry deposition are tested in this study.…”
Section: Parameterizations Of Dry-and Wet Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The typical time scale for this depletion from gaseous to particulate form is, however, large (about 47 days (Maryon et al, 1991)) compared to the length of the model simulation (12 days in this study), so this effect is not taken into account here. Because of these uncertainties, both comprehensive and simple parameterizations of wet-and dry deposition are tested in this study.…”
Section: Parameterizations Of Dry-and Wet Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…131 I is released in its gaseous form, but tends to attach to other particles as e.g. sulphur (Maryon et al, 1991). The effective dry deposition velocity for 131 I therefore tends to decrease with time.…”
Section: Parameterizations Of Dry-and Wet Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use typical values for 131 I and 137 Cs that are found in the literature: the dry deposition velocity of gasphase 131 I is 0.5 (cm s −1 ) (Baklanov and Sorensen, 2001), the dry deposition velocity of particulate 131 I is 0.1 (cm s −1 ) (Baklanov and Sorensen, 2001) and the dry deposition velocity of 137 Cs is 0.05 (cm s −1 ) (Maryon et al, 1991) (the units of all deposition velocities are converted to m s −1 for use in WRF-Chem). One could also use other typical values as the dry deposition velocity for both 131 I and 137 Cs (e.g., as reported by Sportisse (2007), the dry deposition velocity of gas-phase 131 I could range from 0.1 to 0.5 cm s −1 , while the dry deposition velocity of 137 Cs could range from 0.04 to 0.31 cm s −1 ).…”
Section: The Constant Deposition Velocity Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isotopic variables were replaced with radioactive tracers (i.e., 131 I and 137 Cs), and dry and wet deposition processes caused by gravity and precipitation processes, respectively, were introduced. Saya et al (2013) proposed a wet deposition process wherein the deposition is proportional to the ratio of the amount of condensed water to the total amount of water, whereas a traditional method (e.g., Maryon et al, 1991) considers only the amount of condensed water. In this study, the radioactive tracer mode of IsoRSM is used as an original framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%