1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90082-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UCLA abutment: A four-year review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
22

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
38
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the circular shape of the implant and its smaller diameter, when compared with the root of a natural tooth, a dilemma inevitably occurs of how to construct an artificial crown and abutment system that imitates the natural tooth form (Bichacho, 1998). In the past decades, many abutment designs, such as the UCLA abutment (Lewis et al, 1992) and the DIA anatomic abutment (Daftary, 1995), have been introduced in attempts to resolve the stated complications. However, problems of miscasting, inaccuracy fit and unfavorable antirotational capability cannot be avoided when using these abutments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the circular shape of the implant and its smaller diameter, when compared with the root of a natural tooth, a dilemma inevitably occurs of how to construct an artificial crown and abutment system that imitates the natural tooth form (Bichacho, 1998). In the past decades, many abutment designs, such as the UCLA abutment (Lewis et al, 1992) and the DIA anatomic abutment (Daftary, 1995), have been introduced in attempts to resolve the stated complications. However, problems of miscasting, inaccuracy fit and unfavorable antirotational capability cannot be avoided when using these abutments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 It causes inconvenience to the patient and practitioner, and can become financially onerous if it occurs frequently. [3][4][5] Jemt 1 stated that only 69.3% of prostheses had stable gold screws at the first postinsertion examination. Another study specifically examined the incidence of loose occlusal screws in a population of patients whose prostheses had been in use for at least 5 years and reported that 40% of slot-headed occlusal screws and 10% of screws with an internal hexagon were loose.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Some researchers estimate that up to 10% of the initial preload may be lost due to surface imperfections in the first seconds after torque application. 13,21,25 The amount of preload present at the threads of a prosthetic retaining screw 4 depends on the applied torque, the presence and type of lubricant, the physical properties of the materials in contact, and settling of the screw after initial torquing. 26,27 Higher torque usually leads to greater preload values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Long-term evaluation of custom-milled abutments suggests that the real concern for the use of the UCLA abutment was not the fit of an individual casting to an implant, but rather the fit of an implant restoration to multiple implants. 5 Many factors may lead to prosthesis failure, such as an inaccurate impression or analog misplacement or a poor fit in the try-in session. 6 -13 Another difficulty with implant abutment is that the same abutment can be positioned in 6 or 12 different positions, depending on the connection design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%