1995
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00025-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UCLA loneliness scale: Invariance of social structural characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The UCLA Loneliness Scale has been widely used and has been found to be associated with depression (Hsu, Hailey, & Range, 1987;Sümer, Poyrazli, & Grahame, 2008) and anxiety (Sümer et al, 2008) among international students. Allen and Oshagan (1995) found support for the factorial invariance of a brief version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale across diverse racial groups. Validity evidence for this scale has been demonstrated in an Asian international college sample in the United States as well as in a sample of college students in China (B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The UCLA Loneliness Scale has been widely used and has been found to be associated with depression (Hsu, Hailey, & Range, 1987;Sümer, Poyrazli, & Grahame, 2008) and anxiety (Sümer et al, 2008) among international students. Allen and Oshagan (1995) found support for the factorial invariance of a brief version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale across diverse racial groups. Validity evidence for this scale has been demonstrated in an Asian international college sample in the United States as well as in a sample of college students in China (B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The short version of University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA; Allen & Oshagan, 1995) is a 7-item one-dimensional scale that measures the general state of loneliness. Items are rated on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 5 ("extremely characteristic of me").…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of demographic variables, individuals who are married (Allen & Oshagan, 1995), women (Allen & Oshagan, 1995), in lower income (Allen & Oshagan, 1995;Hector-Taylor & Adams, 1996) and less educated (Allen & Oshagan, 1995;Hector-Taylor & Adams, 1996) had higher scores of loneliness than their counterparts. However, while marital status predicted the loneliness scores of the elderly individuals in another study, age and gender did not predict the loneliness scores (Theeke, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%