1994
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.13.3.224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale: Documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students.

Abstract: This article describes the development and validation of the UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale (MCAS). The relationships between the MCAS and gender, sexual experience, intentions to use a condom, and past condom use were assessed. The MCAS has five distinct factors: (a) Reliability and Effectiveness of condoms, (b) the sexual Pleasure associated with condom use, (c) the stigma attached to persons who use condoms (Identity Stigma), (d) the Embarrassment About Negotiation and Use of condoms, and (e) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
184
2
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
184
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[8,9] Knowledge of HIV must certainly have inß uence on condom use, but knowledge is not the only factor involved in choice. [10] Despite the importance of condom use in the fight against HIV, only five condomattitude measures have been reported in the literature -namely, UCLA multidimensional condom attitude scale, [11] 22-item condom use barriers scale developed for Nigerian University students, [12] 57-item condom attitude scale (CAS) developed for American University students, [13] adolescent version of CAS [14] and Brown's attitude toward condoms (ATC) scale. [10] Measures that have demonstrated reliability and validity in one population are not necessarily generalized to other populations, necessitating the testing of instruments in a particular type of population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9] Knowledge of HIV must certainly have inß uence on condom use, but knowledge is not the only factor involved in choice. [10] Despite the importance of condom use in the fight against HIV, only five condomattitude measures have been reported in the literature -namely, UCLA multidimensional condom attitude scale, [11] 22-item condom use barriers scale developed for Nigerian University students, [12] 57-item condom attitude scale (CAS) developed for American University students, [13] adolescent version of CAS [14] and Brown's attitude toward condoms (ATC) scale. [10] Measures that have demonstrated reliability and validity in one population are not necessarily generalized to other populations, necessitating the testing of instruments in a particular type of population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores were skewed; thus, they were winsorized (Wilcox, 1996). Quantity by frequency measures of alcohol consumption are strongly correlated with measures based on daily diaries (Hilton & Clark, 1987;Midanik & Greenfield, 2003;Poikolainen, Podkletnova, & Alho, 2002).Outcome expectancies associated with condom use-The pleasure sub-scale from the UCLA Multidimensional Condom Attitudes Scale (Helweg-Larsen & Collins, 1994) was used to assess positive expectancies regarding condom use. This 5-item subscale assesses expectations that condom use will be associated with pleasurable outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Baja autoeficacia respecto al uso y la negociación del condón: [26][27][28] identifica a los adolescentes que señalaron sentirse muy inseguros sobre más de la mitad de las siguientes elementos: tener un condón en caso de necesitar uno; hablar sobre usar condones con cualquier pareja sexual; hablar sobre usar condón con alguna pareja potencial; convencer a una pareja de usar condón; decir que no quiere tener relaciones sexuales si la pareja no quisiera usar condón, y usar un condón si toma bebidas alcohólicas.…”
Section: Artículo Originalunclassified