The UK's National Programme for IT: Why was it dismantled?

Abstract

This paper discusses the UK's National Programme for IT (NPfIT), which was an ambitious programme launched in 2002 with an initial budget of some £6.2 billion. It attempted to implement a top-down digitization of healthcare in England's National Health Service (NHS). The core aim of the NPfIT was to bring the NHS' use of information technology into the 21st century, through the introduction of an integrated electronic patient record systems, and reforming the way that the NHS uses information, and hence to improve services and the quality of patient care. The initiative was not trusted by doctors and appeared to have no impact on patient safety. The project was marred by resistance due to the inappropriateness of a centralized authority making top-down decisions on behalf of local organizations. The NPfIT was officially dismantled in September 2011. Deemed the world's largest civil IT programme, its failure and ultimate demise sparked a lot of interest as to the reasons why. This paper summarises the underlying causes that lead to dismantling the NPfIT. At the forefront of those circumstances were the lack of adequate end user engagement, the absence of a phased change management approach, and underestimating the scale of the project.

Digital health Systems in Kenyan Public Hospitals: a mixed-methods survey

“…Low-income countries, such as Kenya, are now following this trend and beginning to replace paper-based systems with digital systems [12]. However, the technology landscape is now quite different from 10 years ago, when the systems now in operation in the UK, US and Europe were specified by large national and regional procurement processes [7,13]. Cloud-hosted systems, mobile phones and tablet computers [14] and increasinglymainstream adoption of open source technology offer a different and perhaps more cost-effective path for countries looking to digitise their healthcare systems.…”

A national registry to assess the value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after primary percutaneous coronary intervention pathway activation: a feasibility cohort study

“…The earlier (and equally ambitious) National Programme for IT, which aimed to create a single electronic care record for patients, connect primary and secondary care IT systems and provide a single IT platform for health professionals, was dismantled, mainly because IT companies could not provide solutions to match the ambition. 27,88 Despite such programmes, our experience from this study has highlighted the poor-quality electronic infrastructure in hospitals and the multitude of clinical databases that are not amenable to 'interoperability' (i.e. not needing extensive customisation or permission from the database vendor to provide data flow).…”

Improving data sharing between acute hospitals in England: an overview of health record system distribution and retrospective observational analysis of inter-hospital transitions of care

“…Central to this is the ability to more easily share digital records with other stakeholders involved in caring for an individual patient. Around the world, healthcare policymakers have attempted to improve the adoption and use of EHRs through both incentivisation and legislation 7 9–11. Although EHR usage in both community-level and hospital-level care has dramatically increased,7 12 implementation, integration and interoperability have been challenging 6 7 9 11 12.…”