2016
DOI: 10.1080/23340460.2017.1294465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UK, the European Union and NATO: Brexit’s unintended consequences

Abstract: The result of the UK referendum on membership of the EU has occasioned considerable debate on Britain's international standing. An important (but so far largely overlooked) aspect of this debate is how the possibility of Brexit impacts upon NATO and, specifically, the UK's position within the Atlantic alliance. In this connection, the initial signs are worrying. London may wish to focus on NATO as a way of compensating for a troubled exit from the EU, but its ability to do so is weakened by uncertainties over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NATO, the EU, or both) depends on the agent's capabilities and preferences. After Brexit, the UK will opt by default for NATO (Dunn and Webber, ) – admittedly not a significant re‐orientation in British foreign policy, given its special relationship with the US. However, the UK could lose an ability that other member states have, namely to choose which organisation better fits its preferences.…”
Section: Will Brexit Affect the Eu–nato Relationship?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NATO, the EU, or both) depends on the agent's capabilities and preferences. After Brexit, the UK will opt by default for NATO (Dunn and Webber, ) – admittedly not a significant re‐orientation in British foreign policy, given its special relationship with the US. However, the UK could lose an ability that other member states have, namely to choose which organisation better fits its preferences.…”
Section: Will Brexit Affect the Eu–nato Relationship?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And yet, within the (considerable) literature on the topic, there is no consensus on how the security domain will evolve (e.g. Biscop 2016;Black et al 2017;Blagden 2017;Dunn and Webber 2016;Hadfield 2018;Kienzle and Hallams 2016;Koenig 2016;Whitman 2016a;Whitman 2016b).…”
Section: Integration Theory After Brexitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the pattern of integration/disintegration and differentiation/harmonisation in foreign affairs is thus key to understanding EU/UK security relations after Brexit. And yet, within the (considerable) literature on the topic, there is no consensus on how the security domain will evolve (for example, Biscop, 2016; Black et al, 2017; Blagden, 2017; Dunn and Webber, 2016; Hadfield, 2018; Kienzle and Hallams, 2016; Koenig, 2016; Whitman, 2016a, 2016b).…”
Section: Integration Theory After Brexitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, like the relationship as a whole, an overwhelming British dependency on the United States in space may not always provide strategic returns for the United Kingdom (Dumbrell, 2009: 77). British security risks being fundamentally altered by Brexit (Dunn and Webber, 2016;Oliver and Williams, 2016;Pannier, 2016;Uttley and Wilkinson, 2016a), and in particular by the United Kingdom's potential exclusion from the EU's space industrial policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%