2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The uncertainty in the radon hazard classification of areas as a function of the number of measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the obtained results in the first series, measurements were repeated in some dwellings, and other new dwellings were selected in the forthcoming series. When it is necessary to make some decisions in the area suspected of having high radon, the number of investigated dwellings should not be less than five 34 . A random selection of twenty‐six investigated dwellings was made concerning structure: a single ground floor building with or without a cellar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the obtained results in the first series, measurements were repeated in some dwellings, and other new dwellings were selected in the forthcoming series. When it is necessary to make some decisions in the area suspected of having high radon, the number of investigated dwellings should not be less than five 34 . A random selection of twenty‐six investigated dwellings was made concerning structure: a single ground floor building with or without a cellar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it is necessary to make some decisions in the area suspected of having high radon, the number of investigated dwellings should not be less than five. 34 A random selection of twenty-six investigated dwellings was made concerning structure: a single ground floor building with or without a cellar. The charcoal canisters were deployed on the shelves (at least 1 m from the floor, away from windows/doors) in one or two selected rooms to obtain preliminary results on indoor radon levels in selected buildings.…”
Section: The Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both options require metadata whose variability sufficiently explains the local variability of the target variable (IRC in the example). The filtering leads to data loss and to an increase of coefficient of variation that scales as about 1/√n, where n is the number of measured dwellings (11). In contrast, standardization has the drawback of introducing model uncertainty; for example, normalizing floor level relies on a model derived from data, which implies estimation and prediction uncertainty, since buildings behave differently.…”
Section: Concepts Definitions and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%