2013
DOI: 10.1111/jace.12720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Uniaxial Tensile Response of Porous and Microcracked Ceramic Materials

Abstract: The uniaxial tensile stress-strain behavior of three porous ceramic materials was determined at ambient conditions. Test specimens in the form of thin beams were obtained from the walls of diesel particulate filter honeycombs and tested using a microtesting system. A digital image correlation technique was used to obtain full-field 2D in-plane surface displacement maps during tensile loading, and in turn, the 2D strains obtained from displacement fields were used to determine the Secant modulus, Young's modulu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microcracking is responsible for hysteresis in the thermal expansion and stiffness versus temperature curves (see data on magnesium titanate, aluminum titanate, NZP ceramics, and cordierite) and has been directly observed in SEM studies (e.g., Shyam et al; Harada). Microcracking is also responsible for the nonlinearity of the stress–strain curves, especially in porous ceramics . In comparing the lattice and macroscopic thermal expansions, Ohya et al could only calculate the microcrack volume, whereas Kobayashi et al, estimated the fraction (and crystal orientation) of microcracked grains; none of them attempted at calculating stresses.…”
Section: Microstresses Due To Cooling Of Polycrystalline Ceramics: Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcracking is responsible for hysteresis in the thermal expansion and stiffness versus temperature curves (see data on magnesium titanate, aluminum titanate, NZP ceramics, and cordierite) and has been directly observed in SEM studies (e.g., Shyam et al; Harada). Microcracking is also responsible for the nonlinearity of the stress–strain curves, especially in porous ceramics . In comparing the lattice and macroscopic thermal expansions, Ohya et al could only calculate the microcrack volume, whereas Kobayashi et al, estimated the fraction (and crystal orientation) of microcracked grains; none of them attempted at calculating stresses.…”
Section: Microstresses Due To Cooling Of Polycrystalline Ceramics: Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microtensile tests were conducted using an experimental set-up, as described in detail elsewhere [36]. The main components were a stepper motor (NEMA 23, National Instruments), a 111.1 N (25 lbs) load cell and a custom slider linear air bearing.…”
Section: Tensile Testing Of Microspecimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests were performed under a displacement rate of 0.005 mm s À1 , corresponding to a deformation rate of $0.003 s À1 , and specimen plan view images were captured every second using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor camera. These images were post processed to calculate the 2-D strain maps using a Matlab Ò -based digital image correlation (DIC) program, as described elsewhere [36,[38][39][40]. Each build configuration was tested twice in order to improve the statistical reliability.…”
Section: Tensile Testing Of Microspecimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acicular mullite investigated in this study had needles with a diameter of 10‐20 μm and a length of 200‐400 μm, but these values can vary depending on the precursor composition and dopants chosen . Mechanically, acicular mullite is much stiffer than traditional porous ceramic systems, particularly those commonly used in DPFs …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%