1996
DOI: 10.1016/0166-8641(95)00075-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The union of a connected manifold and a point as fixed set of commuting involutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have seen in [5], the above result for k = 2 together with facts from [7] made it possible to obtain, up to bordism, all possible (Z 2 )…”
Section: Consider (Z 2 )mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As we have seen in [5], the above result for k = 2 together with facts from [7] made it possible to obtain, up to bordism, all possible (Z 2 )…”
Section: Consider (Z 2 )mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This method has shown itself particularly effective when A has a single element, because in this case we have seen that if (M, Φ) is a (Z 2 ) k -action fixing V n ∪ {p}, then its fixed data bears, in terms of bordism, a strong resemblance to the fixed data of σΓ k -actions from a given involution. As an illustration of this effectiveness we have proved further that (M, Φ) is really bordant to some action of type σΓ [7] and [8]). However, if A has more than one element the classification seems much more difficult, because in this case the results of [7] indicate the possibility of other classes added to those produced by the operations σΓ k t ; as we have seen in [5], this is exactly what happens when V n = RP (2r) (Royster has proved in [2] that in this case A has more than one element), and in this case the method of [7] is not enough to determine the classification.…”
Section: Consider (Z 2 )mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations