1995
DOI: 10.2307/1410613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Elizabeth et al (2012: 426), I suggest that ‘as father contact becomes increasingly valorized, the importance attached to financial support is diminishing’. This, in combination with the authority traditionally attached to the male breadwinner (Kenney, 2006), positions fathers as policy and legal subjects who claim control over post-separation finances, choosing if and how money will be paid to former partners and children (Collier, 2009; Cook and Natalier, 2013; Diduck, 1995). This is masculine financial discretion (Diduck, 1995).…”
Section: The Welfare Mother and Masculine Financial Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Elizabeth et al (2012: 426), I suggest that ‘as father contact becomes increasingly valorized, the importance attached to financial support is diminishing’. This, in combination with the authority traditionally attached to the male breadwinner (Kenney, 2006), positions fathers as policy and legal subjects who claim control over post-separation finances, choosing if and how money will be paid to former partners and children (Collier, 2009; Cook and Natalier, 2013; Diduck, 1995). This is masculine financial discretion (Diduck, 1995).…”
Section: The Welfare Mother and Masculine Financial Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in combination with the authority traditionally attached to the male breadwinner (Kenney, 2006), positions fathers as policy and legal subjects who claim control over post-separation finances, choosing if and how money will be paid to former partners and children (Collier, 2009; Cook and Natalier, 2013; Diduck, 1995). This is masculine financial discretion (Diduck, 1995). Further, fathers’ rights groups in Australia, the UK and the USA argue that family law courts and post-separation processes are biased in favour of mothers’ fraudulent financial and custody claims (Collier, 2009; Gavanas, 2004; Graycar, 2008).…”
Section: The Welfare Mother and Masculine Financial Discretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the state produces gendered subject positions through the ‘creation and regulation, construction and instruction’ of ‘proper’ masculinities and femininities (Brush, 2003: 52). This is implicit in the gendered construction of financially autonomous men and financially dependent women who typically occupy the positions of child support payers and recipients respectively (Diduck, 1995). We focus on how these processes were evident in how the key institution of the CSP – the Department of Human Services Child Support (DHSCS) – facilitated men’s discretion and demanded and constrained women’s child support provisioning.…”
Section: The Governance Of Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The omission of lone black mothers in this instance still renders them pathological since it indicates they are not genuinely British. (Silva, 1996: 189) Linking state dependency with bad or lone motherhood suggests that an important part of badness and goodness is whether children are cared for (including paid for) within the privacy of the Family.1 It is mother's role to keep children out of both the state's pockets (usually by being connected to a man), and its regulatory gaze -'[t]he individual mother should have total responsibility for her own children at all times' (Kline in Fineman and Karpin, 1995: 120 quoting Wearing, 1984; and see Diduck, 1995). And so, these collections explore the way in which bad mothers also become those who request or require assistance from the state, and subject that process also to a race and class analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a long tradition of demonising motherhood outside of the Family (Diduck, 1995;Smart, 1992b;Spensky, 1992), and the ideology of the family has played a large part in notions of good and bad mothering (McIntosh in Silva, 1996;Boyd, 1996). Harrison (in Fineman and Karpin, 1995) further demonstrates the importance of family ideology on constructions of motherhood by identifying the difficulties lesbian mothers have in fitting into law's construction of good families and good mothers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%