2013
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2012.746934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The usability of control interfaces in low-carbon housing

Abstract: For the same type of house, energy and water use can vary by up to 14 times between different households in low-carbon housing. This article assesses the usability of key human control interfaces in two contrasting case studies of low-carbon housing, using building performance evaluation and a usability matrix tool. It situates the discussion within socio-technical theories of habit, practice, capabilities and emergent properties in products which facilitate easy, rewarding and energyefficient learning. Key fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was less confidence about whether the guide helps residents to understand the controls -the guide identifies where information about controls could be found, but in many cases the controls themselves were found to be confusing. Both this study and other research in this area (Stevenson et al 2012) have identified that users' knowledge of how to use low energy homes is a significant barrier.…”
Section: Occupancymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…There was less confidence about whether the guide helps residents to understand the controls -the guide identifies where information about controls could be found, but in many cases the controls themselves were found to be confusing. Both this study and other research in this area (Stevenson et al 2012) have identified that users' knowledge of how to use low energy homes is a significant barrier.…”
Section: Occupancymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Based on the TPB, Chen and Knight [19] [10,45], building design robustness [51,52], usability of control systems [53][54][55], social norm, group interaction [19,[56][57][58][59][60][61], personal and cognitive traits (i.e., perceived behavioral control, behavioral intentions, energy saving attitudes) [19,35,46,[62][63][64], and motivational drivers [43,[65][66][67][68]. Langevin, et al [16] observed that behavior sequencing of adaptive actions in office buildings is a complex phenomenon, where multiple behavioral adaptations are sometimes available, and certain interactions are subject to contextual and social constraints instead.…”
Section: Ease and Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tacit knowledge, learning opportunities, and the usability of controls were examined as well as occupant understanding and skills (Stevenson et al, 2013). An ethnographic approach …”
Section: Occupant Feedback and Home Use Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%