2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01019-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use and misuse of ratio and proportion exposure measures in food environment research

Abstract: Background The food stores within residential environments are increasingly investigated as a possible mechanism driving food behaviours and health outcomes. Whilst increased emphasis is being placed on the type of study designs used and how we measure the outcomes, surprisingly little attention gets diverted to the measures of the food environment beyond calls for standardised approaches for food store coding and geographic scales of exposure. Food environments are a challenging concept to mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that have captured the density of fast food outlets close to schools are likely to miss the availability of fast food in other outlets, be that small corner stores or supermarket chains. Similarly, the availability of sweets in a variety of stores in our study questions the protocol of categorising supermarkets as ‘healthy’ and fast food outlets as ‘unhealthy’ in food environment studies [ 10 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studies that have captured the density of fast food outlets close to schools are likely to miss the availability of fast food in other outlets, be that small corner stores or supermarket chains. Similarly, the availability of sweets in a variety of stores in our study questions the protocol of categorising supermarkets as ‘healthy’ and fast food outlets as ‘unhealthy’ in food environment studies [ 10 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A plethora of evidence, with a diverse range of different methods, has investigated links between environmental features, social outcomes, and health outcomes [ 16 , 30 ]. With increasing attention paid to the inclusion of multiple environmental features, recent studies have developed small area indices or used relative measures such as ratios and proportions [ 12 , 27 , 50 ]. There is no clear consensus on the most appropriate measure, yet there is evidence to suggest that environmental features such as fast-food and alcohol outlets co-occur or cluster within neighbourhoods [ 26 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the evidence base around multiple environmental exposures is developing with no recognised gold standard [ 16 ], there is a need to add to this in order to accurately demonstrate how the wider environment influences human behaviour and health. We therefore respond to calls from other researchers who request a continued search for better ways of representing population exposure to the environment [ 50 , 54 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food swamps , more common for the majority of urban settings in Canada, are communities where there is an oversaturation of unhealthy food retailers that crowd out more nutritious offerings ( Minaker, 2016 ; Minaker et al, 2016 ; Rose et al, 2009 ). While ratio and proportion measures are widely used in the food environment literature, they are limited in their ability to discern the differences between food retailers (and the kinds of exposures they present) potentially misleading researchers toward an inaccurate reading of the healthfulness of food environments ( Thornton et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%