1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-2180(99)00068-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of a closed-loop wind tunnel for measuring the combustion efficiency of flames in a cross flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from experiments in a closed-loop wind tunnel where the entire plume of products from the flare could be captured (Bourguignon et al, 1999;Johnson and Kostiuk, 2000;Johnson and Kostiuk, 2002a) have shown that in the case of low-exit-velocity ($0.5-5 m/sec) pipe flares burning hydrocarbon fuel mixtures with heating values equal to or greater than that of natural gas ($37 MJ/m 3 ), gas-phase efficiencies above 98-99% could be expected at low crosswind speeds. However, efficiencies reduced rapidly at high crosswind speeds, with a functional dependence that varied with U 1…”
Section: Previous Emissions Measurements From Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from experiments in a closed-loop wind tunnel where the entire plume of products from the flare could be captured (Bourguignon et al, 1999;Johnson and Kostiuk, 2000;Johnson and Kostiuk, 2002a) have shown that in the case of low-exit-velocity ($0.5-5 m/sec) pipe flares burning hydrocarbon fuel mixtures with heating values equal to or greater than that of natural gas ($37 MJ/m 3 ), gas-phase efficiencies above 98-99% could be expected at low crosswind speeds. However, efficiencies reduced rapidly at high crosswind speeds, with a functional dependence that varied with U 1…”
Section: Previous Emissions Measurements From Flaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By plotting the conversion inefficiency (1 -q ) , the fractional increase of fuel not being burned is emphasized. The methodology used to measure the efficiency has been previously described in detail (Bourguignon et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of hydrocarbon fuels, a higher combustion effi ciency means that carbon in the fuel ends up with more CO 2 , and less CO, soot and other unburnt hydrocarbons (Bourguignon et al, 1999). Koseki and Mulholland (1991) employed the ratio of CO/CO 2 and smoke yield as measures of the combustion effi ciency, and a high level of CO concentration as a sign of poor combustion effi ciency (X1, x1).…”
Section: Influence Of High Altitude On Combustion Efficiency and Radimentioning
confidence: 99%