1989
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/159.3.488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of a DNA Probe for Epidemiological Studies of Candidiasis in Immunocompromised Hosts

Abstract: Reproducible typing procedures to differentiate isolates of Candida albicans are limited. C. albicans isolates were obtained from immunocompromised patients by using DNA restriction enzyme fragment analysis and hybridization with both a radiolabeled mitochondrial DNA probe and a nonradioactive (biotinylated) DNA probe. There were 110 pathogenic and nonpathogenic C. albicans isolates from 63 immunocompromised patients. EcoRI restriction fragment analysis with the biotinylated probe revealed different "fingerpri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The species-specific probes CT13.8 for C. tropicalis, 27A for C. albicans and CK13 for C. krusei were used to determine strain relatedness, and where possible, DNA fingerprints. 27A was cloned by S. Scherer and D. A. Stevens and has been described extensively (Fox et al, 1989;Scherer & Stevens, 1988). CK13 was cloned using the folowing protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species-specific probes CT13.8 for C. tropicalis, 27A for C. albicans and CK13 for C. krusei were used to determine strain relatedness, and where possible, DNA fingerprints. 27A was cloned by S. Scherer and D. A. Stevens and has been described extensively (Fox et al, 1989;Scherer & Stevens, 1988). CK13 was cloned using the folowing protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probe was C. albicans-specific, with several copies dispersed throughout the genome. When total cellular DNA from the C. albicans isolates was digested and hybridized with the probe, the resulting multiple fragments detected following autoradiography constituted molecular 'fingerprint' patterns which could be used to distinguish between different strains (Scherer & Stevens, 1988;Fox et al, 1989). The molecular fingerprints of all nine isolates were clearly different from each other, whereas the fingerprints of spontaneous variant colonies of the same clinical isolate were in each case indistinguishable (data not shown).…”
Section: P J Gallagher and Othersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The extent of variation detected with some of the DNA probes may be as extensive as fingerprinting. Limitations include the need for specialized equipment which may not be available in all clinical laboratories and the need for radiolabeled probes (although development of nonradiolabeled probes are now available, such as the biotinylated probe [20]). In addition, definitive comparisons may require strains to be studied on the same gel, making analysis of large numbers of strains difficult without a computer data base.…”
Section: Electrophoretic Karyotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%