EditorialAbout 20 years ago, I first joined the spasticity measurement research group at biosignal laboratory (leaded by Dr. Jia-Jin Jason Chen) of Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University. At that time, the limitation of clinical approach for spasticity evaluation was initially noted by the researchers [1]. We developed our first quantitative measurement system based on driven motor and torque sensor to precisely measure the reactive resistance of elbow flexors during constant-velocity stretches [2]. We also proposed a parameter (ASRT, averaged speed-dependent reflex torque) to overcome the gravity and inertia problems in vertical stretch circumstance and to quantify the elbow spasticity of stroke patients under the constant-velocity stretch. During the development of spasticity, the changes of ASRT and velocity sensitivity of ASRT (i.e. velocity-dependent properties) of the involved and the intact elbow joints are presented and discussed in the same article [2].Furthermore, we used the measurement system to evaluate the different features between muscle spasticity and rigidity [3]. Spasticity and rigidity are two major hypertonias found in patients with lesions of the upper motor neurons. Without quantitative approach, we commonly differentiate these two hypertonias with clinical experience. In our study, elbow flexors were vertically stretched under four different velocities (40, 80, 120, and 160°/s) through a 75° range of motion in 12 hemiparetic and 16 parkinsonism patients. With velocity dependence analysis, we found very interesting results indicating that rigidity and spasticity have approximately equal velocity dependent properties. In contrast, position dependent properties might be one of the main features to differentiate between these two hypertonias.The motor-based system is excellent in its precise stretch with selected constant-velocity to eliminate the effect of inertia, but the bulky system is obviously not suitable to be online used in clinics. With the knowledge and experience of our motor-based system, a hand-held device was developed [4]. Light-weight air-bag cuffs with a differential pressure sensor and a goniometer were used to measure the resistance and displacement of elbow joint during to-and-fro stretches. Before it was used in stroke patients, three simulation modules representing inertia, damper, and spring modules were evaluated and validated for measurement of reactive resistance and displacement during manual evaluation. We applied the concept used in dynamic shear rheometer test for mechanical analysis of material [5] to decompose viscous component of spastic muscle. From viscous components at four different stretch frequencies (1/3, 1/2, 1 and 3/2 Hz), averaged viscosity denoting the velocity-dependence of joint properties was used to differentiate normal muscle tone and hypertonia. These findings suggest that measurements of viscous component and averaged viscosity during manual sinusoidal stretching using the portable device could be clinically usef...