The Use of Autogenous Bone Grafting to Reconstruct a Mandibular Knife Edge Ridge Before Implant Surgery: A Case Report

Tecimer, Dilek; Behr, Max M.

doi:10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0098:tuoabg>2.3.co;2

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature has cited that the reduction of the alveolar process can occur due to loss of teeth (SEGUNDO, 2000;TECIMER and BEHR, 2001;MATIAS, ANDRADE and FERNANDES, 2004;JUODZBALYS and RAUSTIA, 2004;KLASSMANN, CORÓ, THOMÉ et al, 2006; PEÑARROCHA-DIAGO, GÓMEZ-ADRIÁN, GARCÍA-GARCÍA et al, 2006;SIDDIQUI and SOSOVICKA, 2006), to the trauma (SEGUNDO, 2000; PEÑARROCHA-DIAGO, GÓMEZ-ADRIÁN, GARCÍA-GARCÍA et al, 2006;SIDDIQUI and SOSOVICKA, 2006), aplasia, infections, poorly fitted dentures (SEGUNDO, 2000) and periodontal disease (PEÑARROCHA-DIAGO, GÓMEZ-ADRIÁN, GARCÍA-GARCÍA et al, 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the dental implant placement is often limited, since there is a reduction of the alveolar ridge, resulting in decreased bone volume that will receive the implant (KLASSMANN, CORÓ, THOMÉ et al, 2006;FUKUDA, LINO, OHNUKI et al, 2003) both in height and width (SEGUNDO, 2000; PEÑARROCHA-DIAGO, GÓMEZ-ADRIÁN, GARCÍA-GARCÍA et al, 2006;JUODZBALYS and RAUSTIA, 2004), but besides the quantity, quality of bone also influences (TECIMER and BEHR, 2001), even in the success of treatment (FREITAS and MONTEBELLO FILHO, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Topographic analysis of the mandibular canal in coronal section, in the region of molars

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The studies about bone resorption contributed greatly to the advancement of rehabilitation with dental implants and Buccomaxillo facial Surgery and Traumatology. This phenomenon leads to a more superficial localization of the mandibular canal in relation to the alveolar ridge when teeth are lost, limiting and hindering the installation Bone tissue, of implants, as well as other surgical procedures. This anatomical study aimed to analyze and interpret the distances from the mandibular canal to the alveolar ridge, in groups of dentate individuals and toothless, comparing them statistically, so 20 adult male cadavers divided into two groups, namely group A, formed by 10 dentate and group B, consisting of 10 toothless individuals. All their teeth were dissected and then, were checked the measurements of the distances between the roof of the mandibular canal and the alveolar ridge. The averages found were enlightening to say that bone resorption has consequences for treatment and surgery for dental implants, due to the decreasing bone support for the implantation and other surgical procedures, increasing the risk of injury to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Topographic analysis of the mandibular canal in coronal section, in the region of molars

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the procedure at the same time or at one stage, the implants are placed in the same moment of sinus lifting through grafts. In two stages procedure, the graft is placed first and, after the maturation phase, the implants are installed (Tecimer & Behr, 2001). Depending on the amount of remaining alveolar bone, implants can be placed or not with bone graft simultaneously (Toledo Filho et al).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Homologous Bone Grafts in Maxillary Sinus Lifting

Rossi

Freire

Perussi³

et al. 2012

Int. J. Odontostomat.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Homologous bone has been considered a viable alternative in bone reconstruction in the posterior maxillary area to perform surgeries for the maxillary sinus lifting. The aim of this study was to perform a literature review about the advantages and risks inherent in the use of homologous bone graft coming from the tissue bank to perform the surgery for maxillary sinus lifting. A literature review was conducted on MEDLINE (PubMed), Scielo, Scopus and Lilacs, and based on manuscripts and books published from 1980 to 2010. After reading the titles and abstracts of the manuscripts, 69 studies were selected because of their correlations with the aim of the current study. The use of homologous grafts from bone banks showed greater osteogenic potential and a slow remodeling least compared to other grafts to increase the volume of the posterior bone of the maxilla in surgery for maxillary sinus lifting.

show abstract

“…Rosenquist defined 4 factors considered important to achieve a successful and aesthetically satisfying results; these are: width and position of the attached gingiva, buccal contour of the alveolar process, level and configuration of the alveolar process, and size and shape of the papillae (1). Adequate soft tissue closure represents a critical factor in the success of preprosthetic surgery as well as implant placement, especially when simultaneous peri-implant bone augmentation is performed (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). In cases of bone atrophy, a number of techniques have been proposed depending on the location and size of the defect (1,(7)(8)(9), and different methods have been proposed for management of soft tissues (2,9,10).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Autogenous bone is considered the gold standard for osseous reconstruction because it does not produce immunologic reactions and it contains osteoinductive components (9,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Both extraoral (1,3,13) and intraoral (2,5,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)17) donor sites have been proposed. Lately minimally invasive surgery principles have been applied to preprosthetic-implant surgery, and an adequate presurgical planning might reduce morbidity in both harvesting and stabilization of the bone grafts (1).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Envelope approach for onlay bone grafting: Preliminary surgical and prosthetic results

Hernández–Alfaro¹,

Salvan-García²,

Mareque-Bueno³

et al. 2011

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Minimally invasive surgery principles have been applied to preprosthetic-implant surgery, and an adequate presurgical planning reduces morbidity in both harvesting and stabilization of the bone grafts. Objective: A new "envelope" approach for onlay bone grafting at the alveolar process is presented, this avoids releasing incisions yet allowing adequate reconstruction of the defective site. Study design: To be included in the study the patient had to have an antero-posterior defect of the alveolar crest. Patient age and sex, location of the defect, type and size of graft, and complications appeared during follow up were recorded. Results: Ten consecutive patients (4 men and 6 women) have been succesfully treated with this technique between June/2006 and February/2008. Eight defects were located at the anterior maxilla (between canines), and the remaining two at the anterior mandible (between canines). Four patients received bone grafts harvested from the chin, and the remaining six patients received bone grafts from the mandibular body. Mean size of the graft was: width 11,5mm (range 8 to 17), height 14,7mm (range 9 to 18), depth 4,3mm (range 3 to 6). Conclusion: This technique improves vascularization of the mucoperiosteal flap and avoidance of releasing incisions which has an aesthetic impact in patients with gingival smile.

show abstract

The Use of Autogenous Bone Grafting to Reconstruct a Mandibular Knife Edge Ridge Before Implant Surgery: A Case Report

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Topographic analysis of the mandibular canal in coronal section, in the region of molars

Topographic analysis of the mandibular canal in coronal section, in the region of molars

Use of Homologous Bone Grafts in Maxillary Sinus Lifting

Envelope approach for onlay bone grafting: Preliminary surgical and prosthetic results

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About