1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00236118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of beaks as tools for biomass estimation in the deepwater squid Moroteuthis ingens (Cephalopoda: Onychoteuthidae) in New Zealand waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Jackson (1995) demonstrated, this is not the case for all squid species. However, since beaks of T. eblanae are difficult to distinguish from Illex coindetii beaks (Clarke 1986) the utility is actually limited in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As Jackson (1995) demonstrated, this is not the case for all squid species. However, since beaks of T. eblanae are difficult to distinguish from Illex coindetii beaks (Clarke 1986) the utility is actually limited in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Standard length and biomass of fish species were calculated from the conversion of otolith length (mm) using allometric equations (Adams & Klages 1987, Williams & McEldowney 1990, Cherel et al 1997, Olsson & North 1997 for the majority of species. The conversion of lower rostral length to mantle length and squid body mass was achieved using allometric equations from Clarke (1986), Rodhouse et al (1990) and Jackson (1995). In reconstructing the estimated fish biomass consumed by fur seals from scats, each otolith was considered to represent 1 fish, as there is little chance of all fish and therefore otoliths consumed by the fur seal being present in a particular scat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Length of uneroded or slightly eroded otoliths (OL) and dentary bones (ML for mandible length) of fish, lower rostral length (LRL) of squid beaks, lower hood length (LHL) of octopus beaks, and eye diameter or total length of crustaceans were measured with a vernier caliper or using an ocular scale in a binocular microscope. Fish standard length (SL), cephalopod dorsal mantle length (DML), crustacean total length and prey body masses (M) were calculated using regression equations (Clarke 1986, Adams & Klages 1987, Rodhouse & Yeatman 1990, Williams & McEldowney 1990, Ridoux 1994, Jackson 1995. For the few species where no relationships were available, length and M were estimated using equations for closely related species or for species with a similar morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%