2019
DOI: 10.18502/ijnl.v18i2.1289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of brain stimulation in the rehabilitation of walking disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized double-blind clinical trial study

Abstract: Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex of the lower limb has been exploited in the treatment of patients with stroke and spastic lower limb paresis. We examined this stimulation efficacy in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related walking disability. Methods: In a single-center randomized doubleblind clinical trial study, 13 patients with MS and walking disability and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3 to 6 were randomized to the real and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because some MS symptoms (e.g., neuropathic pain) are treatment-resistant [2], practical and inexpensive adjunctive therapies, like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are of high interest. Despite promising findings in tDCS studies in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) [3][4][5] (see [6] for a review), the validity and utility of tDCS is under scrutiny. For example, a critical review [7] did not support the idea that tDCS has a reliable neurophysiological effect beyond motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude modulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some MS symptoms (e.g., neuropathic pain) are treatment-resistant [2], practical and inexpensive adjunctive therapies, like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are of high interest. Despite promising findings in tDCS studies in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) [3][4][5] (see [6] for a review), the validity and utility of tDCS is under scrutiny. For example, a critical review [7] did not support the idea that tDCS has a reliable neurophysiological effect beyond motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude modulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The authors found a decrease in distance walked in the "during" group and an increase in gait velocity in the "before" group. 18 A previous study using tDCS alone found an increase in gait velocity in the active versus the sham group following seven sessions, 19 but without any corresponding change in self-reported outcomes (MSWS-12 score). Taken together, the present findings suggest that tDCS should be paired with simultaneous exercise or motor training and should include extended treatment with multiple sessions to lead to measurable benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our results are in line with recent reports that proposed NIBS, and tDCS paired with exercise training specifically, to augment or potentiate the benefits induced by physical activity in Parkinson's disease, 39 cerebellar ataxia, 40 and cerebral palsy. 41 Two previous studies have tested anodal tDCS to treat walking impairment in patients with MS, 18,19,21 evaluating outcomes after only one session of tDCS paired with a motor activity 18 or using tDCS only (without paired activity) for five sessions. 21 Most recently, the timing window of tDCS application was assessed using the 6-minute walk test in 12 patients with MS either before or during stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations