1934
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/26.4.404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Confidence or Fiducial Limits Illustrated in the Case of the Binomial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
1,199
1
5

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,901 publications
(1,213 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
1,199
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Proportion of early saccades and error saccades (Zincorrect direction) in the gap task of experiment 1. (The proportion of early saccades was determined from the intersection between two sequential line elements fitted to the gap data in figure 4 (see §2), and binomial CIs calculated using the formula of Clopper & Pearson (1934 respectively; subject B: 21 and 14 ms; subject F: 14 and 20 ms), suggesting that isolating S-cones does not influence the gap effect in a way that differs from other isoluminant colours. Importantly, the absence of a prominent tail of very short saccades indicates that the gap effect is due to a shift in the main saccadic distribution rather than the presence of sub-population of early saccades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportion of early saccades and error saccades (Zincorrect direction) in the gap task of experiment 1. (The proportion of early saccades was determined from the intersection between two sequential line elements fitted to the gap data in figure 4 (see §2), and binomial CIs calculated using the formula of Clopper & Pearson (1934 respectively; subject B: 21 and 14 ms; subject F: 14 and 20 ms), suggesting that isolating S-cones does not influence the gap effect in a way that differs from other isoluminant colours. Importantly, the absence of a prominent tail of very short saccades indicates that the gap effect is due to a shift in the main saccadic distribution rather than the presence of sub-population of early saccades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact 95% confidence interval (CI) for each prevalence rate was obtained by the Clopper-Pearson method [12]. Prevalence rate ratios (PR) were calculated by dividing the prevalence rate for NH-Blacks and Hispanics by the prevalence rate for NH-Whites (referent group).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given an estimate of 5% previous neonatal resuscitation experience, the anticipated width of our 95% CI would be acceptable at # 10% using the twotailed exact binomial distribution. 9 Table 1 provides the characteristics of the study population. There were 130 ED staff screened from August 2010 until October 2010, of whom 107 were eligible and invited to participate: 52 of 77 nurses (67.5%) and 20 of 30 (66.7%) physicians completed the survey, for a response rate of 67.3%.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%