2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2965-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects

Abstract: The present study demonstrates that a customised cage may be a promising option for THA revision of severely compromised acetabula. Extended follow-up is necessary to evaluate the long-term performance of this approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The bilobed and customized prostheses with or without bone grafting are also reported to achieve favorable results. 5,6 In contrast, the results of cementless cup implantation by the rim-fit technique without bone grafting are also fairly favorable. 9,10 However, cementless hemispherical cup implantation without bone grafting poses concerns regarding postoperative issues, including high hip center positioning, which may lead to joint instability or unnatural biomechanical condition, poor initial stability of the acetabular component, and residual gap between the acetabular host bone and the acetabular component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The bilobed and customized prostheses with or without bone grafting are also reported to achieve favorable results. 5,6 In contrast, the results of cementless cup implantation by the rim-fit technique without bone grafting are also fairly favorable. 9,10 However, cementless hemispherical cup implantation without bone grafting poses concerns regarding postoperative issues, including high hip center positioning, which may lead to joint instability or unnatural biomechanical condition, poor initial stability of the acetabular component, and residual gap between the acetabular host bone and the acetabular component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, bone defects reconstruction directly determines the success of THA revision [ 14 ]. Unfortunately, the objectives of restoring or preserving pelvic bone stock, placing the acetabular component to the correct anatomic position to optimize joint stability, equalize leg lengths, and achieve stable fixation are not readily achieved in such a situation [ 3 , 15 , 16 ]. Currently, the methods of bone defects reconstruction mainly include impaction of bone particles graft [ 17 ] and structural bone grafts [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autogenous bone and allograft bone are the common source of bone graft. Autogenous bone is an ideal bone graft material as a result of its osteoinductive and osteoconductive capabilities [ 3 , 15 ]. Although autogenous bone could provide osteogenic cells and has neither the immunogenicity nor the risk of disease transmission, its application is significantly restricted by its single source and limited bone mass, especially in the situation when patients suffer massive bone defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Mao et al (46) used 3D models in 22 patients with hip arthroplasty requiring revision surgery. The 3D models were used to fit the surgically altered acetabulum with commercially available cages or custom acetabular cages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%