2003
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/67661/2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to select bovine embryos

Abstract: A major factor limiting the transgenesis in domestic animals is the inefficiency of maintaining large numbers of recipients carrying nontransgenic foetuses. The objectives of this study were: 1. to determine the influence of green fluorescent protein (GFP) construct injection on the development of bovine embryos, 2. to identify and select the GFP positive bovine embryos, and 3. to determine the rate of mosaicism in transgenic embryos. Cattle oocytes were matured and fertilised in vitro and zygotes were microin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transient expression was detected in 2 out of 357 cleaved embryos and these were removed from in vitro culture. Transient expression can result from episomal expression of unintegrated DNA and is a major barrier in the generation of transgenic animals (Wall, 1997;Duszewska et al, 2004) The effi ciency of production of GFP-positive embryos (3.60%) was lower than in our previous study, 6.57% (Duszewska, 2003) and also in comparison with other studies: 6% (Eyestone, 1999) and 14% (Behboodi et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transient expression was detected in 2 out of 357 cleaved embryos and these were removed from in vitro culture. Transient expression can result from episomal expression of unintegrated DNA and is a major barrier in the generation of transgenic animals (Wall, 1997;Duszewska et al, 2004) The effi ciency of production of GFP-positive embryos (3.60%) was lower than in our previous study, 6.57% (Duszewska, 2003) and also in comparison with other studies: 6% (Eyestone, 1999) and 14% (Behboodi et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The embryos from microinjected and non-injected groups were co-cultured with Vero cells which support embryo development better than other systems of culture used in our laboratory (Duszewska et al, 2000(Duszewska et al, , 2003. Microinjection is a traumatic procedure for zygotes and can cause lysis or reduce early embryo development (Han et al, 2000;Chan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In farm animals, these long-term consequences lead to abnormal birth weight and postnatal growth abnormality, referred to as Large Offspring Syndrome (LOS) (van Wagtgendonk et al, 2000;Bertolini et al, 2002). Sometimes, but not usually, LOS has been associated with in vitro production of embryos, including nuclear transfer and pronuclear injection (Young and Fairburn 2000;review: van Wagtgendonk et al, 2000;Renard et al, 2002;Duszewska et al, 2003Duszewska et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization of pronuclei [30] Evaluation of embryos between days 4 and 8 of culture [31] Evaluation of cleavage [32] Visualization of lipid droplets [33] Comparison of 8-cell-stage embryos in different culture media and visualization of cytoplasmic lipid droplets [34] Visualization of DNA microinjection into the male pronucleus [35,36] Observation of the development of individual embryos [37] Observation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets [38,39] 3.1.…”
Section: Applications Of Dic In Bovine Embryo Analysis Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%