The Use of HMAC-MD5-96 within ESP and AH

Madson, Cheryl; Glenn, Russell W.

doi:10.17487/rfc2403

Cited by 75 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, HMAC-MD5 specified in RFC 2085 (Oehler and Glenn, 1997) recommends the support of long key lengths. However, in RFC 2403 (Madson and Glenn, 1998a), RFC 2404 (Madson and Glenn, 1998b), and RFC 2857 (Keromytis and Provos, 2000), the key size is restricted to 128 bits for HMAC-MD5 and 160 bits for each of HMAC-SHA-1 and HMAC-RIPEMD-160. Therefore, we implemented another version of the HMAC unit using a key size of 160 bits.…”

Section: Hmac Implementation For Fixed Key Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Design Space Exploration of a Reconfigurable HMAC-Hash Unit

Khan

El-Kharashi

Gebali

et al. 2006

2006 ITI 4th International Conference on Information &Amp; Communications Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Hmac Implementation For Fixed Key Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…There exists a number of standardized authentication algorithms using HMAC. The most popular ones are HMAC-MD5 (Madson and Glenn, 1998a), HMAC-SHA-1 (Madson and Glenn, 1998b), and HMAC-RIPEMD-160 (Keromytis and Provos, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design Space Exploration of a Reconfigurable HMAC-Hash Unit

Khan

El-Kharashi

Gebali

et al. 2006

2006 ITI 4th International Conference on Information &Amp; Communications Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We included the hash chain functionalities for hop-count verification in the RREQ, RREP message handling modules. The MD5 [26] was used as the hash function. For the purpose of protecting routing messages with digital signatures, we ported part of the code from the ARAN (Authenticated Routing for Ad-Hoc Networks) implementation [31].…”

Section: Software Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental comparisons between SAODV and AODV routing protocols

Lin

Rad

Wong

et al. 2005

Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Wireless Multimedia Networking and Performance Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There have been various secure routing protocols proposed for mobile ad hoc networks. Most of these protocols are analyzed by two standard techniques: simulation and security analysis. There has been a lack of work related to the performance of secure routing protocols in real network testbed. In this paper, we present quantitative results for the performance comparisons between AODV and SAODV routing protocols by using a small-scale experimental testbed, which consists of 10 laptops within a 250 m by 100 m rugby field. Apart from outdoor testing, we also compare the results with those obtained via simulation and indoor emulation. The workload includes both UDP and TCP traffic. Results show that SAODV is effective in preventing routing message tampering and data dropping attacks. For outdoor experiments, we also estimate the average distance within a communication gray zone under different bit rates.

show abstract

“…The algorithm for SADB_AALG_MD5_HMAC is defined in [MG98a]. The algorithm for SADB_AALG_SHA1HMAC is defined in [MG98b].…”

Section: Algorithm Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%