The Use of Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology in the Performance Appraisal Management of Innovation Capability of University Scientific Research Team

Abstract

This study aims to speed up the progress of scientific research projects in colleges and universities, continuously improve the innovation ability of scientific research teams in colleges and universities, and optimize the current management methods of performance appraisal of college innovation ability. Firstly, the needs of the innovation performance evaluation system are analyzed, and the corresponding innovation performance evaluation index system of scientific research team is constructed. Secondly, the Internet of Things (IoT) combines the Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) to build an innovation capability performance appraisal management terminal. Thirdly, the lightweight deep network has been built into the innovation ability performance assessment management network of university scientific research teams, which relates to the innovation performance assessment index system of scientific research teams. Finally, the system performance is tested. The results show that the proposed method has different degrees of compression for MobileNet, which can significantly reduce the network computation and retain the original recognition ability. Models whose Floating-Point Operations (FLOPs) are reduced by 70% to 90% have 3.6 to 14.3 times fewer parameters. Under different pruning rates, the proposed model has higher model compression rate and recognition accuracy than other models. The results also show that the output of the results is closely related to the interests of the research team. The academic influence score of Team 1 is 0.17, which is the highest among the six groups in this experimental study, indicating that Team 1 has the most significant academic influence. These results provide certain data support and method reference for evaluating the innovation ability of scientific research teams in colleges and universities and contribute to the comprehensive development of efficient scientific research teams.

Analyzing Performance Appraisal System Through Personal Biases: An Empirical Assessment

“…In addition, the research found that employee bias has a significant and negative impact on performance appraisal method. The findings of current research are in line with the previous researches (Haralayya, 2022;Meng & Zhang, 2022;Outila & Fey, 2022;Rana et al, 2022;Rubin et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022). The primary intention behind writing this paper was to study connections that might be made between personal bias and performance rating systems.…”

“…The discussion concludes with a strategy for how employee might boost his output. The employee listens, signs the performance evaluation, and then wonders where the boss got all the performance data he had meticulously gathered (Meng & Zhang, 2022). There are some challenges and factual concerns, ranging from questions of causality to how to assess the efficacy of performance reviews.…”

Model for developing success of the construction business entrepreneurs in Bangkok and its metropolitan region

“…Therefore, innovation is a tool to promote businesses in the competitive environment. Management of innovation is a challenge for the companies (Endres, Huesig, & Pesch, 2022;Meng & Zhang, 2022). All the innovative ideas cannot be implemented in the organization.…”

Retracted: The Use of Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology in the Performance Appraisal Management of Innovation Capability of University Scientific Research Team

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”