2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.08.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of inverse vulcanised polysulfide as an intelligent interfacial modifier in rubber/carbon black composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bound rubber (BR) is the rubber that is physically adsorbed or chemically grafted on filler surface and cannot be extracted by its good solvent anymore after mixing, reflecting the interfacial adhesion between the filler and rubber. , The more BR content, the stronger the interfacial adhesion. As depicted in Figure a, compared with the SBR/Blank compound, the BR content in SBR/SPV1- y compounds are gradually increased with the SPV1 dosage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bound rubber (BR) is the rubber that is physically adsorbed or chemically grafted on filler surface and cannot be extracted by its good solvent anymore after mixing, reflecting the interfacial adhesion between the filler and rubber. , The more BR content, the stronger the interfacial adhesion. As depicted in Figure a, compared with the SBR/Blank compound, the BR content in SBR/SPV1- y compounds are gradually increased with the SPV1 dosage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse vulcanized polysulfide copolymer (SP) was first synthesized via the bulk copolymerization of S 8 (140 g, 0.55 mol) and styrene (60 g, 0.58 mol) at 130 °C for 6 h, as described in our previous work. , The successful synthesis of SP was validated by 1 H NMR and DSC measurements (Figures S1 and S2). GPC measurement indicated the SP molecular weight of 868 g/mol, and elemental analysis revealed that the mass fractions of S, C, and H in SP were 63.2%, 36.4%, and 3.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the DSC results in Figure S12 and Table S5, the crystallinity of EUG-SP-8 (CB) was lower than that of EUG-SP-8 . As reported, CB could capture part of sulfur radicals generated from SP during vulcanization, and the phenyls in SP can interact with electron-rich graphitic CB, and this interaction could reduce the regularity of the EUG chain, resulting in decreased crystallinity . We suspected that the self-reinforcing effect of crystallization was dominant over the CB reinforcing, so the tensile strength of EUG-SP-8 is higher than that of EUG-SP-8 (CB) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The energy storage modulus of EUG-SP-8 was greatly increased from 2000 to 5000 MPa with CB reinforcement, while the value of tan δ and loss modulus around T g of EUG-SP-8­(CB) are lower than that of EUG-SP-8 . This can be ascribed to the improvement dispersity and compatibility of CB and EUG; a large number of EUG chains are adsorbed on the surface of CB and trapped in the CB network, which reduces the amount of rubber that can participate in the glass transition and reduced the tanδ value . Herein, the interface interaction between CB and EUG was enhanced; hence, the damping loss curves move to a high temperature zone (Figure c), resulting in the increased damping peak at room temperature and sound absorption performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bound rubber content can be used to evaluate the interaction between filler and rubber. 42 Higher bound rubber content, means better properties. The bound rubber content (C BR ) of the CNCH/NR composite is 31.1%, which is much higher than that of the MC/NR composite (20.9%), suggesting stronger interaction between NR and CNCH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%