2003
DOI: 10.1079/wps20030019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of markers to determine energy metabolizability and nutrient digestibility in avian species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Sales & Janssens (2003b) Regarding the use or not of the Fe 2 O 3 marker, the metabolizabilities were similar for the two methodologies. However, the use of the marker in the 3-day collection led to the lowest CP metabolizability (P<0.02), which may be explained by the specific aspects concerning the digesta flow in birds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Likewise, Sales & Janssens (2003b) Regarding the use or not of the Fe 2 O 3 marker, the metabolizabilities were similar for the two methodologies. However, the use of the marker in the 3-day collection led to the lowest CP metabolizability (P<0.02), which may be explained by the specific aspects concerning the digesta flow in birds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, commercially available forms of Cr 2 O 3 may contain small amounts of soluble forms of the metal that, if absorbed, may affect results (Neto et al, 2003). According to Sales & Janssens (2003a), the lower results obtained with this methodology are explained by the inherent mistakes to it, such as the variability in the indicator recovery rate in excreta or the lack of uniformity due to the manner in which the indicator combines with larger particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existem, basicamente, dois métodos para a realização desses ensaios: o método convencional ou de coleta total e o método dos indicadores ou substâncias índices. Conforme citado por SALES & JANSSENS (2003), o primeiro requer controle da quantidade do alimento ingerido e das fezes excretadas, exigindo também maior tempo de coleta. Já o segundo pode ser realizado em menor espaço de tempo e não há necessidade da mensuração do que é ingerido e excretado.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However, Oberleas et al (1990) criticized usage of Cr 2 O 3 as marker because it rapidly carried in liquid phase rather than solid phase of digesta. Analytical estimation of Cr 2 O 3 is highly variable with low repeatability (Sales and Janssens, 2003). Acid insoluble ash can also be used as indigestible marker.…”
Section: Digestibility Markermentioning
confidence: 99%