2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
324
0
32

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(369 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
324
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Like other developed countries, usage of smartphone among youth especially students is rapidly growing in Pakistan. Scholars recently reported that most college-going students of age 18 to 29 are addictive users of smartphone (Crompton & Burke, 2018;Klimova, 2018). Students also using a smartphone for academic learning purpose for several reasons (Vanden Abeele, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other developed countries, usage of smartphone among youth especially students is rapidly growing in Pakistan. Scholars recently reported that most college-going students of age 18 to 29 are addictive users of smartphone (Crompton & Burke, 2018;Klimova, 2018). Students also using a smartphone for academic learning purpose for several reasons (Vanden Abeele, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the context of plant blindness, as discussed above, longer engagement times with plant material improves future plant awareness (Balas & Momsen, 2014;Lindemann-Matthies, 2005). We found our students were highly engaged with Even though previous research suggests students need to perceive value and relevance to embrace mobile learning (Crompton & Burke, 2018), our students were highly engaged for relatively small rewards. In Life on Earth, students were allocated full marks for entering sensible responses regardless of whether they were correct and in Plant Science there were no marks associated with the practical (but students were informed it would help with the exam, still a month away).…”
Section: Student Engagement and The Student Experiencementioning
confidence: 49%
“…Even though previous research suggests students need to perceive value and relevance to embrace mobile learning (Crompton & Burke, ), our students were highly engaged for relatively small rewards. In Life on Earth , students were allocated full marks for entering sensible responses regardless of whether they were correct and in Plant Science there were no marks associated with the practical (but students were informed it would help with the exam, still a month away).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As smart mobile phones and other types of hand-held devices are ever increasingly developed, it is thought that their integration in the educational sector as well as in EFL classrooms will always rise. According to Crompton and Burke [12], research in mobile learning has been divided and is closely related to the understanding of the experimenter. Moreover, there is still few systematic information which is available based on over 20 years of mobile learning research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, many research studies ınvestigate the facets of m-learning for both the researchers as well as the instructional designers and also pays attention on the effective usage of the latest mobile learning technologies for education [21], but did not focus on English language learning. On the contrary, there are many review studies on mobiles and ubiquitous learning [12,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Therefore, this review focuses on three factors ((i) research problem, (ii) participants' level of study, (iii) English skills) and their effect on groups' size, the duration of the experiment and which assessment(s) is appropriate and also fits for the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%