2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of multilevel models for the prediction of road accident outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a multilevel setting, correlation at a sub-level is taken care of by inclusion of random parameters which are constant within the sub-level but are allowed to vary at the upper levels [18,20,37].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a multilevel setting, correlation at a sub-level is taken care of by inclusion of random parameters which are constant within the sub-level but are allowed to vary at the upper levels [18,20,37].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Many researchers have used binary logit models for accident severity analysis [5,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For multilevel data, the resulting model is called the multilevel sequential binary logit model (MBL).…”
Section: Multilevel Logistic Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the GEE procedure can successfully account for the temporal correlation in the crash frequency data, it cannot address the spatial correlation that could also exist in the crash data. Recently, researchers have proposed more sophisticated models which can account for the spatial correlation across locations, such as the random-effects model (Shankar et al, 1998;Miaou and Lord, 2003;Quddus, 2008) and the hierarchica/multilevel model (Jones and Jørgensen, 2003;Kim et al, 2007). Considering the spatial correlation in the modeling procedure could improve the model predictions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those methodologies include the generalized estimating equation (GEE) (Lord and Persaud, 2000;Wang and Abdel-Aty, 2006;2008), the randomeffects model (Shankar et al, 1998;Miaou and Lord, 2003;Quddus, 2008), the hierarchica/multilevel model (Jones and Jørgensen, 2003;Kim et al, 2007), and the multivariate modeling approaches (Ma and Kockelman, 2006;Park and Lord, 2007;El-Basyouny and Sayed, 2009). However, several models may not be appropriate for practical applications because they are very complicated and difficult to solve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%